Vulnerability Database

328,099

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "enterprise_linux_hpc_node"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/enterprise_linux_hpc_node/1.2.3

redhat / enterprise_linux_hpc_node

146 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low July 25, 2017 7/25/17
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium July 21, 2017 7/21/17
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium July 21, 2017 7/21/17
== 6.0
== 7.0
High July 21, 2017 7/21/17
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium July 21, 2017 7/21/17
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium June 8, 2017 6/8/17
== 7.0
Medium June 8, 2017 6/8/17
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium June 8, 2017 6/8/17
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium June 8, 2017 6/8/17
== 6.0
== 7.0
High June 8, 2017 6/8/17
== 7.0
Low April 19, 2017 4/19/17
== 7.0
Low April 14, 2017 4/14/17
== 6.0
== 7.0
High April 14, 2017 4/14/17
== 7.0
Medium April 11, 2017 4/11/17
== 7.0
Medium April 11, 2017 4/11/17
== 7.0
Medium April 11, 2017 4/11/17
== 7.0
Medium April 11, 2017 4/11/17
== 7.0
High January 27, 2017 1/27/17
== 6.0
High January 27, 2017 1/27/17
== 6.0
High January 27, 2017 1/27/17
== 6.0
High January 19, 2017 1/19/17
== 6.0
== 7.0
Low December 22, 2016 12/22/16
== 7.0
High December 14, 2016 12/14/16
== 7.0
Low October 13, 2016 10/13/16
== 7.0
Low September 21, 2016 9/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low September 21, 2016 9/21/16
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium September 21, 2016 9/21/16
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium September 21, 2016 9/21/16
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium September 21, 2016 9/21/16
== 7.0
Medium September 21, 2016 9/21/16
== 7.0
Medium July 19, 2016 7/19/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low June 27, 2016 6/27/16
== 7.0
High June 27, 2016 6/27/16
== 7.0
Medium June 13, 2016 6/13/16
== 7.0
Low June 7, 2016 6/7/16
== 6.0
== 7.0
High June 7, 2016 6/7/16
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium May 16, 2016 5/16/16
== 7.0
Medium May 16, 2016 5/16/16
== 7.0
High May 16, 2016 5/16/16
== 7.0
High May 16, 2016 5/16/16
== 7.0
High May 16, 2016 5/16/16
== 7.0
High May 16, 2016 5/16/16
== 7.0
High May 16, 2016 5/16/16
== 7.0
High May 16, 2016 5/16/16
== 7.0
Medium May 16, 2016 5/16/16
== 7.0
Medium May 16, 2016 5/16/16
== 7.0
Medium May 5, 2016 5/5/16
== 6.0
== 7.0
High May 5, 2016 5/5/16
== 6.0
== 7.0
Low May 5, 2016 5/5/16
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium May 5, 2016 5/5/16
== 6.0
== 7.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.