Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "enterprise_linux_server_tus"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/enterprise_linux_server_tus/1.2.3

redhat / enterprise_linux_server_tus

767 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low January 9, 2015 1/9/15
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 6.6
== 7.7
Low January 9, 2015 1/9/15
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 6.6
== 7.7
Medium January 9, 2015 1/9/15
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 6.6
== 7.7
Low December 16, 2014 12/16/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 6.6
== 7.7
Medium December 16, 2014 12/16/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
High November 14, 2014 11/14/14
== 6.6
Low November 1, 2014 11/1/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Medium October 10, 2014 10/10/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Critical September 25, 2014 9/25/14
== 6.5
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Critical September 24, 2014 9/24/14
== 6.5
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Medium August 1, 2014 8/1/14
== 6.5
High August 1, 2014 8/1/14
== 6.5
Low July 3, 2014 7/3/14
== 6.6
Medium June 5, 2014 6/5/14
== 6.5
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
High June 5, 2014 6/5/14
== 6.5
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Medium June 5, 2014 6/5/14
== 6.5
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Medium April 30, 2014 4/30/14
== 6.5
High April 30, 2014 4/30/14
== 6.5
Critical April 30, 2014 4/30/14
== 6.5
High April 30, 2014 4/30/14
== 6.5
Medium April 30, 2014 4/30/14
== 6.5
Critical April 30, 2014 4/30/14
== 6.5
High April 30, 2014 4/30/14
== 6.5
Low April 16, 2014 4/16/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Low April 16, 2014 4/16/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Medium April 16, 2014 4/16/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Low April 16, 2014 4/16/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
Medium April 16, 2014 4/16/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Low April 16, 2014 4/16/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Low April 16, 2014 4/16/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Low April 16, 2014 4/16/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Medium April 15, 2014 4/15/14
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
High April 7, 2014 4/7/14
== 6.5
Low March 21, 2014 3/21/14
== 6.5
== 7.3
== 7.6
== 7.7
Critical March 19, 2014 3/19/14
== 6.5
High March 19, 2014 3/19/14
== 6.5
High March 19, 2014 3/19/14
== 6.5
Critical March 19, 2014 3/19/14
== 6.5
High March 19, 2014 3/19/14
== 6.5
Critical March 19, 2014 3/19/14
== 6.5
Critical March 19, 2014 3/19/14
== 6.5
High March 19, 2014 3/19/14
== 6.5
High March 19, 2014 3/19/14
== 6.5
Critical March 19, 2014 3/19/14
== 6.5
High March 11, 2014 3/11/14
== 6.5
High February 28, 2014 2/28/14
== 6.5
High February 6, 2014 2/6/14
== 6.5
Critical February 6, 2014 2/6/14
== 6.5
High February 6, 2014 2/6/14
== 6.5
High February 6, 2014 2/6/14
== 6.5

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.