Vulnerability Database

325,773

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "foxit_reader"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/foxit_reader/1.2.3

foxitsoftware / foxit_reader

372 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High December 31, 2020 12/31/20
< 10.1.1
< 4.1.1
High December 22, 2020 12/22/20
== 10.0.0.37527
High December 22, 2020 12/22/20
== 10.1.0.37527
High December 22, 2020 12/22/20
== 10.1.0.37527
High December 22, 2020 12/22/20
== 10.1.0.37527
Medium December 15, 2020 12/15/20
< 10.1.0.37527
High November 2, 2020 11/2/20
>= 9.7.1 < 10.0.0
High October 13, 2020 10/13/20
<= 10.0.1.35811
High October 13, 2020 10/13/20
<= 10.0.1.35811
High October 13, 2020 10/13/20
<= 10.0.1.35811
High October 13, 2020 10/13/20
<= 10.0.1.35811
High October 13, 2020 10/13/20
<= 10.0.1.35811
Critical October 2, 2020 10/2/20
< 10.1
Critical October 2, 2020 10/2/20
< 10.1
Medium October 2, 2020 10/2/20
< 10.1
Critical October 2, 2020 10/2/20
< 10.1
High October 2, 2020 10/2/20
< 10.1
Critical October 2, 2020 10/2/20
< 10.1
High October 2, 2020 10/2/20
< 4.1
High April 22, 2020 4/22/20
<= 9.7.1.29511
High October 25, 2019 10/25/19
<= 9.6.0.25114
High September 30, 2019 9/30/19
<= 9.6.0.25114
High September 30, 2019 9/30/19
<= 9.6.0.25114
Medium June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
Medium June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
Medium June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
Medium June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
Medium June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
Medium June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
Medium June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
Medium June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
Medium June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
High June 3, 2019 6/3/19
<= 9.4.1.16828
Low May 13, 2019 5/13/19
== 3.1.0.0111
Low January 3, 2019 1/3/19
< 9.4
Low January 3, 2019 1/3/19
< 9.4
Medium January 3, 2019 1/3/19
< 9.4
Low November 20, 2018 11/20/18
== 9.3.0.10826

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.