Found 1 matching product.
You can search for specific versions with /product/internet_information_server/1.2.3
| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Medium | November 14, 2000 11/14/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | October 20, 2000 10/20/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 20, 2000 10/20/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 17, 2000 7/17/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 14, 2000 7/14/00 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Low | July 13, 2000 7/13/00 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 11, 2000 5/11/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | May 11, 2000 5/11/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 10, 2000 5/10/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 6, 2000 5/6/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | April 12, 2000 4/12/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | March 30, 2000 3/30/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | March 20, 2000 3/20/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Low | February 15, 2000 2/15/00 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | February 2, 2000 2/2/00 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 26, 2000 1/26/00 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 21, 2000 1/21/00 |
*
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 11, 2000 1/11/00 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 31, 1999 12/31/99 |
== 3.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 31, 1999 12/31/99 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 31, 1999 12/31/99 |
<= 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 31, 1999 12/31/99 |
== 3.0
|
|
|
|
High | December 31, 1999 12/31/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 31, 1999 12/31/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | December 31, 1999 12/31/99 |
== 4.0-sp4
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 21, 1999 12/21/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 21, 1999 12/21/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | September 23, 1999 9/23/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | August 19, 1999 8/19/99 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Low | August 11, 1999 8/11/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | August 11, 1999 8/11/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | July 19, 1999 7/19/99 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 7, 1999 7/7/99 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 6, 1999 7/6/99 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | June 16, 1999 6/16/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 12, 1999 5/12/99 |
*
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 7, 1999 5/7/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 7, 1999 5/7/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 7, 1999 5/7/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 7, 1999 5/7/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | February 19, 1999 2/19/99 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | February 11, 1999 2/11/99 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | February 9, 1999 2/9/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 27, 1999 1/27/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | January 27, 1999 1/27/99 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | January 26, 1999 1/26/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | January 26, 1999 1/26/99 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 24, 1999 1/24/99 |
== 3.0
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
High | January 14, 1999 1/14/99 |
== 4.0
|
|
|
|
Low | January 14, 1999 1/14/99 |
== 4.0
|
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.