Vulnerability Database

327,921

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "internet_information_services"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/internet_information_services/1.2.3

microsoft / internet_information_services

89 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Critical March 27, 2017 3/27/17
== 6.0
Medium November 11, 2014 11/11/14
== 8.5
== 8.0
Medium April 23, 2014 4/23/14
== 4.0
== 5.0
High December 23, 2010 12/23/10
== 7.5
High September 15, 2010 9/15/10
== 7.5
Low September 15, 2010 9/15/10
== 7.5
Medium December 29, 2009 12/29/09
== 5.0
== 6.0
Medium December 29, 2009 12/29/09
<= 6.0
Medium September 4, 2009 9/4/09
>= 5.0 <= 7.0
High June 10, 2009 6/10/09
== 5.0
High June 10, 2009 6/10/09
== 5.1
== 6.0
Medium January 15, 2009 1/15/09
== 5.0
Medium January 15, 2009 1/15/09
== 5.0
High October 15, 2008 10/15/08
>= 5.0 <= 7.0
High February 12, 2008 2/12/08
== 5.0
High May 22, 2007 5/22/07
== 5.0
High December 15, 2006 12/15/06
== 5.1
Low December 15, 2006 12/15/06
== 1.0
== 2.0
Medium July 11, 2006 7/11/06
== 5.0
High December 20, 2005 12/20/05
== 5.1
Medium August 23, 2005 8/23/05
== 5.0
Low July 5, 2005 7/5/05
== 5.0
== 6.0
Medium November 3, 2004 11/3/04
== 5.0
Medium June 9, 2003 6/9/03
== 5.0
High June 9, 2003 6/9/03
== 5.0
Medium June 9, 2003 6/9/03
== 5.0
Medium June 9, 2003 6/9/03
== 5.0
Medium December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 5.0
Medium December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 5.0
Low December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 5.0
Medium December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 5.1
Medium December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 5.1
Medium December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 5.0
High December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 5.0
Medium December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 5.0
Medium December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 5.0
High November 12, 2002 11/12/02
== 5.0
High November 12, 2002 11/12/02
== 5.0
Medium November 12, 2002 11/12/02
== 5.0
Medium November 12, 2002 11/12/02
== 5.0
Medium August 12, 2002 8/12/02
== 5.0
Low August 12, 2002 8/12/02
== 5.0
High July 3, 2002 7/3/02
== 5.0
Medium May 16, 2002 5/16/02
== 5.0
High April 22, 2002 4/22/02
== 5.0
Medium April 22, 2002 4/22/02
== 5.0
Medium April 22, 2002 4/22/02
== 5.0
High April 22, 2002 4/22/02
== 5.0
High April 22, 2002 4/22/02
== 5.0
High April 22, 2002 4/22/02
== 5.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.