Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "mandrake_linux"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/mandrake_linux/1.2.3

mandrakesoft / mandrake_linux

134 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium December 6, 2004 12/6/04
== 9.2
== 10.0
Low October 20, 2004 10/20/04
== 9.2
== 10.0
High October 20, 2004 10/20/04
== 9.2
== 10.0
High September 28, 2004 9/28/04
== 9.2
== 10.0
Medium September 16, 2004 9/16/04
== 9.2
== 10.0
High September 16, 2004 9/16/04
== 9.2
== 10.0
Medium September 13, 2004 9/13/04
== 10.0
High August 6, 2004 8/6/04
== 9.2
== 9.0
== 9.1
== 10.0
High August 6, 2004 8/6/04
== 9.2
== 9.0
== 9.1
== 10.0
Low August 6, 2004 8/6/04
== 9.2
== 9.1
== 10.0
Low August 6, 2004 8/6/04
== 9.2
== 9.1
== 10.0
Low August 6, 2004 8/6/04
== 9.2
== 10.0
Low July 7, 2004 7/7/04
== 9.2
== 10.0
High May 4, 2004 5/4/04
== 9.2
== 10.0
Medium February 16, 2004 2/16/04
== 10.1
== 10.0
Medium January 5, 2004 1/5/04
== 9.2
== 9.1
Low August 27, 2003 8/27/03
== 8.2
== 9.0
High July 24, 2003 7/24/03
== 9.0
== 9.1
High February 19, 2003 2/19/03
== 8.2
== 8.1
== 9.0
Medium December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 8.2
Low December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 7.1
== 9.0
== 8.0
Low December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 8.1
Low December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 8.2
== 8.1
== 8.0
High October 28, 2002 10/28/02
== 7.2
== 8.2
== 8.1
== 9.0
== 8.0
Medium August 12, 2002 8/12/02
== 7.2
== 8.2
== 7.0
== 8.1
== 7.1
== 8.0
Critical March 15, 2002 3/15/02
== 7.2
== 8.1
== 7.1
== 8.0
High February 27, 2002 2/27/02
== 8.1
== 8.0
High January 31, 2002 1/31/02
== 8.1
Low December 12, 2001 12/12/01
== 8.1
High November 30, 2001 11/30/01
== 8.1
High November 28, 2001 11/28/01
== 7.1
== 7.3
== 8.0
Low October 18, 2001 10/18/01
== 7.2
== 7.1
== 8.0
High July 18, 2001 7/18/01
== 7.2
== 7.1
== 8.0
Medium July 16, 2001 7/16/01
== 7.2
== 7.1
== 8.0
High July 2, 2001 7/2/01
== 7.2
== 7.1
High July 2, 2001 7/2/01
== 7.2
== 7.1
High June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 7.2
== 7.0
== 7.1
== 6.0
== 6.1
Low June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 7.2
== 7.1
== 6.0
== 6.1
High June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 7.2
== 7.0
== 7.1
== 6.0
== 6.1
High June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 7.2
== 7.1
High June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 7.2
== 7.0
== 7.1
== 6.0
== 6.1
Low June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 7.2
High June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 8.0
Low June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 2007
High May 3, 2001 5/3/01
== 7.2
== 7.1
Low March 26, 2001 3/26/01
== 7.2
== 7.0
== 7.1
== 6.0
== 6.1
Low March 26, 2001 3/26/01
== 7.2
== 7.0
== 7.1
== 6.1
Medium March 12, 2001 3/12/01
== 7.2
Low March 12, 2001 3/12/01
== 7.2
== 7.0
== 7.1
== 6.0
== 6.1
Low March 12, 2001 3/12/01
== 7.2
== 7.0
== 7.1
== 6.0
== 6.1

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.