Vulnerability Database

325,773

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "netweaver"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/netweaver/1.2.3

sap / netweaver

90 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low February 16, 2016 2/16/16
== 7.40
Low January 15, 2016 1/15/16
== 7.40
Medium January 15, 2016 1/15/16
== 7.40
Medium August 24, 2015 8/24/15
== 7.40
Medium April 1, 2015 4/1/15
== 7.40
Medium April 1, 2015 4/1/15
== 7.40
== 7.0
Medium November 6, 2014 11/6/14
<= 7.01
== 7.20
High November 4, 2014 11/4/14
*
Medium November 4, 2014 11/4/14
== 7.30
== 7.02
Medium November 4, 2014 11/4/14
== 7.30
== 7.02
Medium September 5, 2014 9/5/14
== 7.20
== 7.0
Medium May 19, 2014 5/19/14
<= 7.20
== 7.02
== 7.03
== 7.0-sp15
== 7.0-ehp2
== 7.01
== 7.0-ehp1
== 7.0-sp8
== 7.10
== 7.0
Medium February 14, 2014 2/14/14
== 7.20
Low February 14, 2014 2/14/14
== 3.0
== 7.11
== 7.02
== 7.01
== 7.10
== 7.0
High December 13, 2013 12/13/13
== 7.30
High November 23, 2013 11/23/13
== 7.30
Medium November 20, 2013 11/20/13
== 6.4
<= 7.02
Medium November 20, 2013 11/20/13
<= 7.31
== 7.30
== 7.02
== 7.03
== 6.4
== 7.0-sp15
== 7.0-ehp2
== 4.0
== 7.01
== 7.0-ehp1
== 7.0-sp8
== 7.10
== 7.0
Medium October 24, 2013 10/24/13
<= 7.31
== 7.30
== 7.02
== 7.03
== 6.4
== 4.0
== 7.01
== 7.10
== 7.0
Medium September 16, 2013 9/16/13
== 7.30
== 7.02
== 7.03
== 7.0-sp15
== 7.0-ehp2
== 7.01
== 7.0-ehp1
== 7.0-sp8
== 7.10
== 7.0
High September 12, 2013 9/12/13
== 7.30
Medium August 16, 2013 8/16/13
== 7.03
Low February 12, 2013 2/12/13
== 6.4
== 7.0-sp15
== 7.0-ehp2
== 4.0
== 7.0-ehp1
== 7.0-sp8
== 7.0
Low February 12, 2013 2/12/13
== 7.02
== 7.0-sp15
== 7.0-ehp2
== 7.01
== 7.0-ehp1
== 7.0-sp8
<= 7.30
== 7.10
== 7.0
Medium May 15, 2012 5/15/12
== 7.0-ehp2
== 7.0-ehp1
Medium May 15, 2012 5/15/12
== 7.0-ehp2
== 7.0-ehp1
Medium May 15, 2012 5/15/12
== 7.0-ehp2
== 7.0-ehp1
Medium May 15, 2012 5/15/12
== 7.0-ehp2
== 7.0-ehp1
High May 15, 2012 5/15/12
== 7.0-ehp2
== 7.0-ehp1
Medium May 15, 2012 5/15/12
== 7.0-ehp2
== 7.0-ehp1
Low February 23, 2012 2/23/12
== 7.0
Low February 23, 2012 2/23/12
== 7.0
Medium February 23, 2012 2/23/12
== 7.0
Medium February 23, 2012 2/23/12
== 7.0
Low December 8, 2011 12/8/11
*
Low July 28, 2010 7/28/10
*
== 6.4
== 7.0
Low April 29, 2010 4/29/10
== 4.0
== 7.0
Low August 21, 2009 8/21/09
== 7.0
Low January 28, 2009 1/28/09
*
Low April 16, 2008 4/16/08
<= 7.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.