Vulnerability Database

327,916

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "sunos"

Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/sunos/1.2.3

sun / sunos

62 vulnerabilities found (with exploits)
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low August 16, 2012 8/16/12
== 5.11
Medium August 16, 2012 8/16/12
== 5.11
Low August 16, 2012 8/16/12
== 5.11
Low August 16, 2012 8/16/12
== 5.11
Medium August 16, 2012 8/16/12
== 5.11
Low August 16, 2012 8/16/12
== 5.11
Low August 16, 2012 8/16/12
== 5.11
Medium August 16, 2012 8/16/12
== 5.11
Low August 16, 2012 8/16/12
== 5.11
High January 19, 2011 1/19/11
== 5.8
== 5.10
== 5.9
Medium March 11, 2009 3/11/09
== 5.10
High June 16, 2008 6/16/08
<= -
Low March 24, 2008 3/24/08
== 5.10
Medium May 30, 2007 5/30/07
== 5.8
== 5.10
== 5.9
High February 12, 2007 2/12/07
== 5.10
== 5.11
Medium December 31, 2005 12/31/05
== 5.7
== 5.8
High June 29, 2005 6/29/05
== 5.8
High December 31, 2004 12/31/04
== 5.7
== 5.8
== 5.9
High September 9, 2003 9/9/03
== 5.8
Low August 27, 2003 8/27/03
== 5.7
== 5.8
High July 3, 2003 7/3/03
== 5.8
High May 5, 2003 5/5/03
== 5.7
== 5.8
== 5.5.1
High March 25, 2003 3/25/03
== 5.7
== 5.8
== 5.5.1
High March 7, 2003 3/7/03
== 5.7
== 5.8
Low January 3, 2003 1/3/03
== 5.7
== 5.8
== 5.5.1
Critical August 12, 2002 8/12/02
== 5.7
== 5.8
== 5.5.1
High July 3, 2002 7/3/02
== 5.7
== 5.8
== 5.5.1
High July 3, 2002 7/3/02
== 5.7
== 5.8
Low December 31, 2001 12/31/01
== 5.8
High December 31, 2001 12/31/01
== 5.8
High December 31, 2001 12/31/01
<= 5.9
High December 12, 2001 12/12/01
== 5.3
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.8
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
== 5.0
== 5.1
== 5.2
High October 18, 2001 10/18/01
== 5.7
== 5.8
High August 14, 2001 8/14/01
== 5.3
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.8
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
== 5.0
== 5.1
== 5.2
Low August 14, 2001 8/14/01
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.5.1
<= 5.9
Low August 2, 2001 8/2/01
== 5.7
== 5.8
Low August 2, 2001 8/2/01
== 5.7
== 5.8
Medium July 7, 2001 7/7/01
== 5.7
== 5.8
== 5.5.1
High July 5, 2001 7/5/01
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.8
== 5.5.1
Medium July 2, 2001 7/2/01
<= 5.9
High July 2, 2001 7/2/01
== 5.3
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.8
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
High July 2, 2001 7/2/01
== 5.7
== 5.8
High May 3, 2001 5/3/01
== 5.7
== 5.8
High May 3, 2001 5/3/01
== 5.8
High March 12, 2001 3/12/01
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
High December 19, 2000 12/19/00
== 5.5.1
High November 14, 2000 11/14/00
== 5.3
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.8
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
== 5.0
== 5.1
== 5.2
High June 14, 2000 6/14/00
== 5.3
== 4.1.4
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.8
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
== 4.1.3
== 5.6
== 5.0
== 5.1
== 5.2
High April 24, 2000 4/24/00
== 5.7
Low December 31, 1999 12/31/99
<= 4.1.1

Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "sunos". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.