Vulnerability Database

328,119

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "windows_media_player"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/windows_media_player/1.2.3

microsoft / windows_media_player

52 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High June 10, 2015 6/10/15
== 10.00.00.4019
== 11.0.5721.5230
== 12
== 10.00.00.4036
== 11.0.6000.6324
== 10.00.00.3990
== 10.00.00.3646
== 11.0.5721.5145
== 10
== 11
Medium March 31, 2014 3/31/14
== 11.0.5721.5230
High July 10, 2013 7/10/13
== 12
== 11
High October 13, 2010 10/13/10
== 9
== 10
== 11
== 12
High August 27, 2010 8/27/10
*
High April 14, 2010 4/14/10
== 9
Low March 23, 2010 3/23/10
== 11.0.6000.6324
== 11.0.5721.5145
== 11
Low February 26, 2010 2/26/10
== 11.0.5721.5145
== 9
High December 13, 2009 12/13/09
*
High October 14, 2009 10/14/09
== 9
High October 14, 2009 10/14/09
== 6.4
High October 14, 2009 10/14/09
== 9
High April 17, 2009 4/17/09
== 11.0.5721.5260
Low December 29, 2008 12/29/08
== 10
== 11
== 9
High December 10, 2008 12/10/08
== 6.4
High December 10, 2008 12/10/08
== 6.4
Low November 4, 2008 11/4/08
== 10
== 11
== 9
High September 11, 2008 9/11/08
== 11
High December 17, 2007 12/17/07
== 6.4
Medium December 4, 2007 12/4/07
== 11
High September 26, 2007 9/26/07
== 9
High August 14, 2007 8/14/07
== 7.1
== 10
== 11
== 9
Low August 14, 2007 8/14/07
== 7.1
== 10
== 11
== 9
Low August 9, 2007 8/9/07
== 11
Medium December 13, 2006 12/13/06
== 6.4
High November 28, 2006 11/28/06
== 10.00.00.4036
High June 13, 2006 6/13/06
== 10
== 9
High February 14, 2006 2/14/06
== 7.1
== 10
== 9
Medium October 12, 2005 10/12/05
== 9
High May 14, 2005 5/14/05
== 10
== 9
Low December 18, 2004 12/18/04
== 9
Medium December 18, 2004 12/18/04
== 9
High November 23, 2004 11/23/04
== 9
High February 8, 2004 2/8/04
== 9
Medium December 31, 2003 12/31/03
== 7
== 7.1
== 6.4
== 9
High August 27, 2003 8/27/03
== 7
== 8
Medium July 24, 2003 7/24/03
== 9
High May 27, 2003 5/27/03
== 7.1
High December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 6.3
High December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 7
== 6.3
== 7.1
== 6.4
High July 3, 2002 7/3/02
== 7.1
== 6.4
High July 3, 2002 7/3/02
== 7.1
High June 25, 2002 6/25/02
<= 8.00.00.4477
High December 6, 2001 12/6/01
== 6.4
High September 20, 2001 9/20/01
== 7
<= 7.1
== 6.4
High June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 7
== 6.3
== 6.4
Medium June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 7
== 6.4
High June 2, 2001 6/2/01
== 7
Medium March 12, 2001 3/12/01
== 7
Low January 9, 2001 1/9/01
== 7
== 6.4

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.