Vulnerability Database

328,411

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "consul"

Found 3 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/consul/1.2.3

hashicorp / consul

35 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium October 28, 2025 10/28/25
< 1.18.12
< 1.22.0
>= 1.19.0 < 1.20.8
>= 1.21.0 < 1.21.6
Medium October 28, 2025 10/28/25
< 1.18.12
< 1.22.0
>= 1.19.0 < 1.20.8
>= 1.21.0 < 1.21.6
High October 30, 2024 10/30/24
>= 1.19.0 < 1.19.3
>= 1.18.0 < 1.18.5
== 1.20.0
>= 1.9.0 < 1.15.15
>= 1.4.1 < 1.20.1
Medium October 30, 2024 10/30/24
>= 1.19.0 < 1.19.3
>= 1.18.0 < 1.18.5
>= 1.4.1 < 1.15.15
>= 1.4.1 < 1.20.0
High October 30, 2024 10/30/24
>= 1.19.0 < 1.19.3
>= 1.18.0 < 1.18.5
== 1.20.0
>= 1.9.0 < 1.15.15
>= 1.4.1 < 1.20.1
Medium December 4, 2023 12/4/23
>= 1.2.0 < 1.2.4
== 1.1.0
>= 1.0.0 < 1.0.8
< 0.9.4
High August 9, 2023 8/9/23
== 1.16.0-rc1
== 1.16.0
High June 2, 2023 6/2/23
>= 1.15.0 < 1.15.3
Low June 2, 2023 6/2/23
>= 1.15.0 < 1.15.3
>= 1.13.0 < 1.14.7
Low March 9, 2023 3/9/23
< 1.14.5
Medium November 16, 2022 11/16/22
>= 1.13.0 <= 1.13.3
Medium September 23, 2022 9/23/22
< 1.11.9
>= 1.12.0 < 1.12.5
>= 1.13.0 < 1.13.2
High September 23, 2022 9/23/22
== 1.12.4
== 1.13.1
>= 1.8.1 < 1.11.9
High April 19, 2022 4/19/22
>= 1.11.0 < 1.11.5
>= 1.10.0 < 1.10.10
< 1.9.17
Medium February 24, 2022 2/24/22
>= 1.8.0 < 1.9.15
>= 1.10.0 < 1.10.8
>= 1.11.0 < 1.11.3
High December 12, 2021 12/12/21
>= 1.10.0 < 1.10.4
>= 1.9.0 < 1.9.11
>= 1.7.0 < 1.8.17
High September 7, 2021 9/7/21
>= 1.10.0 < 1.10.2
>= 1.9.0 < 1.9.9
< 1.8.15
Medium September 7, 2021 9/7/21
>= 1.10.0 < 1.10.2
>= 1.9.0 < 1.9.9
< 1.8.15
High July 17, 2021 7/17/21
>= 1.10.0 < 1.10.1
>= 1.3.0 < 1.8.14
>= 1.9.0 < 1.9.8
High July 17, 2021 7/17/21
>= 1.10.0 < 1.10.1
>= 1.9.0 < 1.9.8
Medium April 20, 2021 4/20/21
>= 1.9.0 < 1.9.5
>= 1.8.0 < 1.8.10
< 1.7.14
High April 20, 2021 4/20/21
>= 1.9.0 < 1.9.5
>= 1.8.0 < 1.8.10
High January 11, 2021 1/11/21
>= 1.10.0 < 1.10.2
>= 1.9.0 < 1.9.9
< 1.8.15
Medium November 23, 2020 11/23/20
>= 1.8.0 < 1.8.6
>= 1.7.0 < 1.7.10
>= 1.2.0 < 1.6.10
High November 4, 2020 11/4/20
>= 1.7.0 <= 1.8.4
High June 11, 2020 6/11/20
>= 1.7.0 < 1.7.4
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.6
Medium June 11, 2020 6/11/20
>= 1.7.0 < 1.7.4
>= 1.4.0 <= 1.6.6
>= 1.4.0 < 1.6.6
High June 11, 2020 6/11/20
>= 1.7.0 < 1.7.4
>= 1.4.0 < 1.6.6
High June 11, 2020 6/11/20
>= 1.7.0 < 1.7.4
>= 1.2.0 < 1.6.6
High January 31, 2020 1/31/20
< 1.6.2
Medium January 31, 2020 1/31/20
>= 1.4.1 < 1.6.2
Medium June 6, 2019 6/6/19
>= 1.4.0 <= 1.5.0
Medium March 26, 2019 3/26/19
== 1.4.3
Medium March 5, 2019 3/5/19
>= 1.4.0 < 1.4.3
Low December 9, 2018 12/9/18
>= 0.5.1 <= 1.4.0

makandra / consul

1 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Critical September 23, 2019 9/23/19
<= 1.0.2
Ruby icon

consul

1 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Critical September 23, 2019 9/23/19
< 1.0.3

Showing vulnerabilities for 3 products matching "consul". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.