Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "crucible"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/crucible/1.2.3

atlassian / crucible

52 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High May 21, 2024 5/21/24
>= 4.8.0 < 4.8.15
Critical July 20, 2022 7/20/22
< 4.8.10
High July 20, 2022 7/20/22
< 4.8.10
Low March 16, 2022 3/16/22
< 4.8.9
Medium March 16, 2022 3/16/22
< 4.8.9
High March 16, 2022 3/16/22
< 4.8.9
Critical March 16, 2022 3/16/22
< 4.8.9
Low March 14, 2022 3/14/22
< 4.8.9
Low February 2, 2021 2/2/21
< 4.8.4
Medium January 18, 2021 1/18/21
< 4.8.5
Low December 21, 2020 12/21/20
>= 4.8.0 < 4.8.5
< 4.7.4
High November 25, 2020 11/25/20
< 4.8.4
High November 25, 2020 11/25/20
< 4.8.4
Medium June 1, 2020 6/1/20
< 4.8.2
Medium June 1, 2020 6/1/20
< 4.8.1
Low June 1, 2020 6/1/20
< 4.8.1
Low June 1, 2020 6/1/20
< 4.8.1
Medium June 1, 2020 6/1/20
< 4.8.1
Medium June 1, 2020 6/1/20
< 4.8.1
High June 1, 2020 6/1/20
< 4.8.1
Low December 11, 2019 12/11/19
< 4.7.3
Medium December 11, 2019 12/11/19
< 4.7.3
Low December 11, 2019 12/11/19
< 4.8.0
Low November 8, 2019 11/8/19
< 4.7.2
Medium April 30, 2019 4/30/19
< 4.7.0
Low February 20, 2019 2/20/19
< 4.7.0
Low February 20, 2019 2/20/19
< 4.7.0
Low October 16, 2018 10/16/18
< 4.6.1
Low September 18, 2018 9/18/18
< 4.5.4
Low August 13, 2018 8/13/18
< 4.6.0
Low July 10, 2018 7/10/18
< 4.5.3
Low June 28, 2018 6/28/18
>= 4.4.0 < 4.4.3
< 4.3.2
>= 4.4.5 < 4.5.0
Low April 24, 2018 4/24/18
< 4.5.3
Medium March 29, 2018 3/29/18
>= 4.5.0 < 4.5.3
>= 4.4.0 < 4.4.6
Low March 22, 2018 3/22/18
== 4.5.0
>= 4.4.0 < 4.4.3
Low February 19, 2018 2/19/18
< 4.4.3
Low February 19, 2018 2/19/18
>= 4.4.0 < 4.4.3
Medium February 19, 2018 2/19/18
< 4.5.1
Low February 16, 2018 2/16/18
>= 4.4.0 < 4.4.3
Low February 16, 2018 2/16/18
>= 4.4.0 < 4.4.3
Low February 2, 2018 2/2/18
== 4.6.0
< 4.5.1
Low February 2, 2018 2/2/18
< 4.5.1
High February 1, 2018 2/1/18
< 4.4.5
>= 4.5.0 < 4.5.2
High November 29, 2017 11/29/17
< 4.4.3
== 4.5.0
Low October 11, 2017 10/11/17
<= 4.4.1
Low October 11, 2017 10/11/17
<= 4.4.1
High August 24, 2017 8/24/17
<= 4.4.0
Low August 24, 2017 8/24/17
<= 4.4.0
Low August 24, 2017 8/24/17
== 4.3.1
== 4.4.0
Low August 24, 2017 8/24/17
<= 4.4.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.