Vulnerability Database

355,882

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "debian_linux"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/debian_linux/1.2.3

debian / debian_linux

15498 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High April 11, 2016 4/11/16
== 8.0
High April 11, 2016 4/11/16
== 8.0
Medium April 11, 2016 4/11/16
== 7.0
Medium April 11, 2016 4/11/16
== 7.0
Medium April 11, 2016 4/11/16
== 7.0
High April 8, 2016 4/8/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
High April 8, 2016 4/8/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
High April 7, 2016 4/7/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
Low April 7, 2016 4/7/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
Medium April 7, 2016 4/7/16
== 8.0
Medium March 30, 2016 3/30/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
High March 29, 2016 3/29/16
== 8.0
High March 29, 2016 3/29/16
== 8.0
High March 29, 2016 3/29/16
== 8.0
High March 29, 2016 3/29/16
== 8.0
High March 29, 2016 3/29/16
== 8.0
== 9.0
High March 24, 2016 3/24/16
== 8.0
High March 17, 2016 3/17/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
High March 14, 2016 3/14/16
== 8.0
High March 13, 2016 3/13/16
== 8.0
Medium March 13, 2016 3/13/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
High March 9, 2016 3/9/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
== 9.0
Medium March 9, 2016 3/9/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
== 9.0
Medium March 9, 2016 3/9/16
== 8.0
High March 3, 2016 3/3/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
Medium March 3, 2016 3/3/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
High March 3, 2016 3/3/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
Medium February 23, 2016 2/23/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
Low February 22, 2016 2/22/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
High February 21, 2016 2/21/16
== 8.0
Medium February 21, 2016 2/21/16
== 8.0
Low February 19, 2016 2/19/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
Medium February 18, 2016 2/18/16
== 8.0
Medium February 17, 2016 2/17/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
High February 17, 2016 2/17/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
Medium February 15, 2016 2/15/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
== 9.0
Critical February 15, 2016 2/15/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
== 9.0
High February 15, 2016 2/15/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
== 9.0
Medium February 14, 2016 2/14/16
== 8.0
Low February 14, 2016 2/14/16
== 8.0
Low February 14, 2016 2/14/16
== 8.0
Medium February 14, 2016 2/14/16
== 8.0
Medium February 14, 2016 2/14/16
== 8.0
Medium February 14, 2016 2/14/16
== 8.0
Medium February 13, 2016 2/13/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
Low February 13, 2016 2/13/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
High February 13, 2016 2/13/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
Medium February 13, 2016 2/13/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
Medium February 13, 2016 2/13/16
== 8.0
== 7.0
Medium February 13, 2016 2/13/16
== 8.0
== 7.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.