Vulnerability Database

326,970

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "emacs"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/emacs/1.2.3

gnu / emacs

34 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High November 27, 2024 11/27/24
< 30.1
Critical June 23, 2024 6/23/24
< 29.4
High March 25, 2024 3/25/24
< 29.3
Low March 25, 2024 3/25/24
< 29.3
Medium March 25, 2024 3/25/24
< 29.3
High March 25, 2024 3/25/24
< 29.3
High May 17, 2023 5/17/23
== 26.1-9.el8
== 27.2-8.el9
High March 9, 2023 3/9/23
>= 28.1 <= 28.2
High March 9, 2023 3/9/23
>= 28.1 <= 28.2
Critical February 20, 2023 2/20/23
<= 28.2
High February 20, 2023 2/20/23
<= 28.2
High February 20, 2023 2/20/23
<= 28.2
High November 28, 2022 11/28/22
<= 28.2
Low October 31, 2017 10/31/17
<= 25.3.0
Medium September 14, 2017 9/14/17
<= 25.2
Medium August 28, 2017 8/28/17
== 24.4
Low May 8, 2014 5/8/14
== 22.1
== 21.1
== 21.3
== 20.1
== 20.5
== 20.4
== 20.7
== 20.6
== 21.2
== 23.3
== 23.1
== 20.2
== 21.3.1
== 22.3
<= 24.3
== 24.2
== 23.4
== 21
== 20.3
== 21.4
== 21.2.1
== 22.2
== 23.2
== 20.0
== 24.1
Low May 8, 2014 5/8/14
== 22.1
== 21.1
== 21.3
== 20.1
== 20.5
== 20.4
== 20.7
== 20.6
== 21.2
== 23.3
== 23.1
== 20.2
== 21.3.1
== 22.3
<= 24.3
== 24.2
== 23.4
== 21
== 20.3
== 21.4
== 21.2.1
== 22.2
== 23.2
== 20.0
== 24.1
Low May 8, 2014 5/8/14
== 22.1
== 21.1
== 21.3
== 20.1
== 20.5
== 20.4
== 20.7
== 20.6
== 21.2
== 23.3
== 23.1
== 20.2
== 21.3.1
== 22.3
<= 24.3
== 24.2
== 23.4
== 21
== 20.3
== 21.4
== 21.2.1
== 22.2
== 23.2
== 20.0
== 24.1
Low May 8, 2014 5/8/14
== 22.1
== 21.1
== 21.3
== 20.1
== 20.5
== 20.4
== 20.7
== 20.6
== 21.2
== 23.3
== 23.1
== 20.2
== 21.3.1
== 22.3
<= 24.3
== 24.2
== 23.4
== 21
== 20.3
== 21.4
== 21.2.1
== 22.2
== 23.2
== 20.0
== 24.1
Medium August 25, 2012 8/25/12
== 23.3
== 23.4
== 23.2
== 24.1
High January 19, 2012 1/19/12
== 22.1
== 21.1
== 21.3
== 20.1
== 20.5
<= 23.3
== 20.4
== 20.7
== 20.6
== 21.2
== 23.1
== 20.2
== 21.3.1
== 22.3
== 23.4
== 21
== 20.3
== 21.4
== 21.2.1
== 22.2
== 23.2
== 20.0
Low April 5, 2010 4/5/10
== 22.1
== 23.1
== 22.3
== 22.2
Medium May 12, 2008 5/12/08
== 21.3.1
Low April 22, 2008 4/22/08
== 21.1
== 21.3
== 20.7
== 21.2
== 21.4
High December 7, 2007 12/7/07
*
Medium November 2, 2007 11/2/07
<= 22.1
High June 21, 2007 6/21/07
== 21
High February 7, 2005 2/7/05
== 21.3
<= 20.0
Medium December 31, 2003 12/31/03
== 21.2.1
Low August 7, 2001 8/7/01
== 20.4
Low April 18, 2000 4/18/00
== 20.1
== 20.5
== 20.4
== 20.6
== 20.2
== 20.3
== 20.0
Low April 18, 2000 4/18/00
== 20.1
== 20.5
== 20.4
== 20.6
== 20.2
== 20.3
== 20.0
Low April 18, 2000 4/18/00
== 20.1
== 20.5
== 20.4
== 20.6
== 20.2
== 20.3
== 20.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.