Vulnerability Database

325,981

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "email_security_appliance"

Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/email_security_appliance/1.2.3

sonicwall / email_security_appliance

3 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
CVE-2019-7488
Critical December 23, 2019 12/23/19
<= 10.0.2
CVE-2019-7489
Critical December 23, 2019 12/23/19
<= 10.0.2
CVE-2014-2879
Low April 17, 2014 4/17/14
<= 7.4.5

cisco / email_security_appliance

46 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
CVE-2020-3548
Medium November 18, 2024 11/18/24
<= 13.5.1-277
CVE-2023-20075
Medium March 1, 2023 3/1/23
>= 14.3.0 < 14.3.0-032
>= 14.0.0 < 14.2.1-020
>= 13.5.0 < 13.5.4-038
>= 13.0.0 < 13.0.5-007
>= 12.5.0 < 12.5.3-041
CVE-2023-20009
Medium March 1, 2023 3/1/23
>= 14.3.0 < 14.3.0-032
>= 14.0.0 < 14.2.1-020
>= 13.5.0 < 13.5.4-038
>= 13.0.0 < 13.0.5-007
< 12.5.3-041
CVE-2022-20960
High November 4, 2022 11/4/22
< 14.2.1-015
>= 14.3.0 < 14.3.0-020
CVE-2022-20664
High June 15, 2022 6/15/22
< 14.0.2-020
CVE-2022-20798
Critical June 15, 2022 6/15/22
== 7.1.5
>= 14.0 < 14.0.1-033
CVE-2021-1129
Medium January 20, 2021 1/20/21
== 13.0.0
CVE-2020-3133
High September 23, 2020 9/23/20
< 13.0
CVE-2020-3137
Medium September 23, 2020 9/23/20
<= 13.0.0
CVE-2019-1947
High September 23, 2020 9/23/20
== 11.1.0-131
CVE-2019-1983
Medium September 23, 2020 9/23/20
== 11.0.1-hp5-602
== 11.1.0-404
CVE-2020-3447
Medium August 17, 2020 8/17/20
< 13.5.1
CVE-2020-3370
Medium July 16, 2020 7/16/20
>= 13.5.0 < 13.5.1
< 13.0.1
CVE-2020-3181
Medium March 4, 2020 3/4/20
< 13.0.0
CVE-2020-3164
Medium March 4, 2020 3/4/20
<= 13.0.0-392
CVE-2020-3132
Medium February 19, 2020 2/19/20
< 12.5.1-037
< 13.0.0-375
CVE-2020-3134
Medium January 26, 2020 1/26/20
< 13.0
CVE-2019-1933
Low July 6, 2019 7/6/19
== 11.1.2-023
CVE-2019-1921
Medium July 6, 2019 7/6/19
== 12.0.0-419
CVE-2019-1905
Medium June 20, 2019 6/20/19
== 11.1.2
== 12.0.0
CVE-2019-1844
Medium May 3, 2019 5/3/19
== 11.1.0-131
CVE-2019-1831
Medium April 18, 2019 4/18/19
== 11.1.2-023
== 12.0.0-208
CVE-2017-6783
Low August 17, 2017 8/17/17
== 9.7.2-065
CVE-2017-6661
Low June 13, 2017 6/13/17
== 10.0.0-203
== 10.1.0-049
CVE-2017-3800
Medium January 26, 2017 1/26/17
== 9.8.5-085
== 9.7.1-066
== 9.7.1-hp2-207
CVE-2016-9202
Low December 14, 2016 12/14/16
== 9.5.0-201
== 9.4.0
== 9.4.4-000
== 9.7.0-125
== 9.6.0-000
== 9.1.2-023
== 9.6.0-051
== 9.7.2-046
== 9.7.1-066
== 9.1.2-036
== 9.1.1-036
== 9.7.2-047
== 9.5.0-000
== 9.6.0-042
== 9.1.2-028
== 9.7.2-054
CVE-2016-6465
Low December 14, 2016 12/14/16
== 9.7.2-047
== 10.0.0-125
== 8.5.7-042
== 10.0.0-232
CVE-2016-1411
Low December 14, 2016 12/14/16
== 7.5.2-201
== 7.5.2-hp2-303
== 8.0.1-023
== 7.6.3-025
== 8.5.1-021
== 8.5.0-000
== 8.5.0-er1-198
CVE-2016-6372
Medium October 28, 2016 10/28/16
== 9.5.0-201
== 9.9_base
== 8.5.6-073
== 8.6.0
== 8.9.1-000
== 8.6.0-011
== 9.1.0-032
== 8.0_base
== 9.4.0
== 9.4.4-000
== 9.7.0-125
== 9.6.0-000
== 9.0.0-461
== 8.0.1-023
== 9.1.1-000
== 9.6.0-051
== 9.1.0
== 9.0.0-212
== 9.7.1-066
== 8.5.6-052
== 9.9.6-026
== 9.5.0-000
== 8.5.6-074
== 8.5.0-000
== 8.5.6-106
== 8.9.2-032
== 8.5.6-113
== 9.1.0-101
== 9.6.0-042
== 9.0.0
== 8.9.0
== 8.5.7-042
== 9.0.5-000
== 9.1.0-011
== 8.5.0-er1-198
CVE-2016-6360
Medium October 28, 2016 10/28/16
== 9.5.0-201
== 9.7.0-125
== 9.6.0-000
== 9.6.0-051
== 9.5.0-000
== 9.6.0-042
CVE-2016-6358
Medium October 28, 2016 10/28/16
== 9.9_base
== 9.7.2-046
== 9.7.1-066
== 9.9.6-026
== 9.7.2-047
== 9.7.2-054
CVE-2016-6357
Medium October 28, 2016 10/28/16
== 9.7.1-066
== 9.9.6-026
CVE-2016-6356
High October 28, 2016 10/28/16
== 9.5.0-201
== 7.6.0
== 8.5.6-073
== 8.6.0
== 8.9.1-000
== 8.6.0-011
== 9.1.0-032
== 7.7.0-000
== 7.1.4
== 7.6.3-000
== 8.0_base
== 7.5.2-201
== 9.4.0
== 9.4.4-000
== 9.7.0-125
== 9.6.0-000
== 9.0.0-461
== 8.0.1-023
== 7.6.3-025
== 3.3.1-09
== 7.5.0
== 7.1.1
== 9.6.0-051
== 7.1.3
== 7.6.1-000
== 9.1.0
== 9.0.0-212
== 9.7.1-066
== 8.5.6-052
== 7.3.0
== 7.3.2
== 7.1.2
== 9.5.0-000
== 8.5.6-074
== 7.3.1
== 7.6.1-gpl-022
== 8.5.0-000
== 8.5.6-106
== 8.9.2-032
== 7.8.0-311
== 8.5.6-113
== 9.1.0-101
== 7.1.5
== 9.6.0-042
== 7.5.1
== 9.0.0
== 7.5.2
== 8.9.0
== 8.5.7-042
== 7.7.1-000
== 7.6.2
== 7.1.0
== 9.0.5-000
== 7.8.0
== 9.1.0-011
== 8.5.0-er1-198
CVE-2016-1486
High October 28, 2016 10/28/16
== 9.5.0-201
== 8.5.6-073
== 8.6.0
== 8.9.1-000
== 8.6.0-011
== 9.1.0-032
== 9.4.0
== 9.4.4-000
== 9.7.0-125
== 9.6.0-000
== 9.0.0-461
== 9.1.1-000
== 9.6.0-051
== 9.1.0
== 9.0.0-212
== 8.5.6-052
== 9.5.0-000
== 8.5.6-074
== 8.5.0-000
== 8.5.6-106
== 8.9.2-032
== 8.5.6-113
== 9.1.0-101
== 9.6.0-042
== 9.0.0
== 8.9.0
== 8.5.7-042
== 9.0.5-000
== 9.1.0-011
== 8.5.0-er1-198
CVE-2016-1481
High October 28, 2016 10/28/16
== 9.5.0-201
== 8.5.6-073
== 8.6.0
== 8.9.1-000
== 8.6.0-011
== 9.1.0-032
== 9.4.0
== 9.4.4-000
== 9.7.0-125
== 9.6.0-000
== 9.0.0-461
== 9.1.1-000
== 9.6.0-051
== 9.1.0
== 9.0.0-212
== 8.5.6-052
== 9.5.0-000
== 8.5.6-074
== 8.5.0-000
== 8.5.6-106
== 8.9.2-032
== 8.5.6-113
== 9.1.0-101
== 9.6.0-042
== 9.0.0
== 8.9.0
== 8.5.7-042
== 9.0.5-000
== 9.1.0-011
== 8.5.0-er1-198
CVE-2016-1480
Medium October 28, 2016 10/28/16
== 9.5.0-201
== 8.5.6-073
== 8.6.0
== 8.9.1-000
== 8.6.0-011
== 9.1.0-032
== 8.0_base
== 9.4.0
== 9.4.4-000
== 9.7.0-125
== 9.6.0-000
== 9.0.0-461
== 8.0.1-023
== 9.1.1-000
== 9.1.0
== 9.0.0-212
== 8.5.6-052
== 9.5.0-000
== 8.5.6-074
== 8.5.0-000
== 8.5.6-106
== 8.9.2-032
== 8.5.6-113
== 9.1.0-101
== 9.6.0-042
== 9.0.0
== 8.9.0
== 8.5.7-042
== 9.0.5-000
== 9.1.0-011
== 8.5.0-er1-198
CVE-2016-1423
Low October 28, 2016 10/28/16
== 8.9.1-000
== 9.1.0-032
== 9.0.0-461
== 9.1.0
== 9.0.0-212
== 8.9.2-032
== 9.1.0-101
== 9.0.0
== 8.9.0
== 9.0.5-000
== 9.1.0-011
CVE-2016-6416
Low October 5, 2016 10/5/16
== 9.9_base
== 9.6.0-000
== 9.6.0-051
== 9.7.1-066
== 9.9.6-026
== 9.6.0-042
CVE-2016-1405
Medium June 8, 2016 6/8/16
== 9.6.0-042
CVE-2015-6321
High November 6, 2015 11/6/15
== 7.6.1-000
== 7.6.3-000
== 7.7.0-000
== 7.7.1-000
== 7.8.0-311
== 8.5.6-052
== 8.6.0-011
== 8.9.1-000
== 8.9.2-032
== 9.0.0-212
== 9.0.5-000
== 9.1.0-011
== 9.4.4-000
== 9.5.0-000
CVE-2015-6291
High November 6, 2015 11/6/15
== 8.5.6-073
== 9.1.0-032
== 7.7.0-000
== 8.0_base
== 9.0.0-461
== 9.0.0-212
== 8.5.6-052
== 8.5.6-074
== 8.5.6-106
== 8.5.6-113
== 9.6.0-042
== 9.0.0
== 8.5.7-042
== 8.5_base
== 7.7.1-000
== 9.0.5-000
CVE-2015-6309
Medium October 2, 2015 10/2/15
== 9.6.0-042
CVE-2015-6285
Medium September 14, 2015 9/14/15
== 7.6.0
== 8.0.0
CVE-2015-4288
Low July 29, 2015 7/29/15
== 8.5.7-042
CVE-2015-4236
Low July 10, 2015 7/10/15
== 8.5.6-074
CVE-2015-4184
Medium June 13, 2015 6/13/15
== 3.331-09
== 8.5.6-074
== 7.5.1-gpl-022

Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "email_security_appliance". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.