Vulnerability Database

347,064

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "enterprise_linux"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/enterprise_linux/1.2.3

redhat / enterprise_linux

3367 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low January 27, 2016 1/27/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
High January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 21, 2016 1/21/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Critical January 8, 2016 1/8/16
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low November 24, 2015 11/24/15
== 7.0
Low October 22, 2015 10/22/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low October 21, 2015 10/21/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low October 21, 2015 10/21/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low October 21, 2015 10/21/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low October 19, 2015 10/19/15
== 7.1
Medium September 8, 2015 9/8/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium August 14, 2015 8/14/15
<= 5.0
Low August 6, 2015 8/6/15
== 6.0
Low July 16, 2015 7/16/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low July 7, 2015 7/7/15
== 7.0
Medium June 24, 2015 6/24/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
High June 9, 2015 6/9/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
High June 9, 2015 6/9/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium June 9, 2015 6/9/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
High June 9, 2015 6/9/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium June 9, 2015 6/9/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium June 9, 2015 6/9/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
High June 9, 2015 6/9/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
High June 9, 2015 6/9/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium June 9, 2015 6/9/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
High May 13, 2015 5/13/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
== 5
High April 13, 2015 4/13/15
== 7.0
Medium February 25, 2015 2/25/15
== 6.0
== 5
High February 24, 2015 2/24/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
== 5
Medium January 26, 2015 1/26/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
High January 26, 2015 1/26/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
High January 21, 2015 1/21/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
== 5.0
High January 21, 2015 1/21/15
== 7.0
Medium January 21, 2015 1/21/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
== 5.0
High January 21, 2015 1/21/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
== 5.0
Medium January 21, 2015 1/21/15
== 7.0
== 6.0
== 5

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.