Vulnerability Database

347,064

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "enterprise_linux"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/enterprise_linux/1.2.3

redhat / enterprise_linux

3367 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium May 9, 2011 5/9/11
== 5.0
Medium May 4, 2011 5/4/11
== 6.0
Low May 3, 2011 5/3/11
== 5.0
Medium April 8, 2011 4/8/11
*
Medium February 24, 2011 2/24/11
== 3
== 4
== 5
== 6.0
Medium February 22, 2011 2/22/11
== 6.0
== 5.0
Low December 30, 2010 12/30/10
== 5
High December 6, 2010 12/6/10
== 6.0
== 5.0
Critical November 5, 2010 11/5/10
== 6.0
== 5.0
High September 24, 2010 9/24/10
== 6.0
High September 24, 2010 9/24/10
== 6.0
Low July 2, 2010 7/2/10
== 3-ga
== 3
== 3.0
Low May 12, 2010 5/12/10
== 5
== 5-ga
== 5.0
Low March 16, 2010 3/16/10
== 6.0
== 5.0
Medium March 16, 2010 3/16/10
== 4
High March 5, 2010 3/5/10
== 5.0
Low January 27, 2010 1/27/10
== 5
High January 9, 2010 1/9/10
== 4.0
== 5.0
High November 20, 2009 11/20/09
== 5.0
Medium August 11, 2009 8/11/09
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 3.0
Medium July 17, 2009 7/17/09
== 3.0
High June 12, 2009 6/12/09
== 4.0
== 5.0
High April 9, 2009 4/9/09
== 4.0
Medium February 12, 2009 2/12/09
== 3.0
Medium November 27, 2008 11/27/08
== 5.0
Medium November 27, 2008 11/27/08
== 5.0
Low October 3, 2008 10/3/08
== 5-unknown
Medium September 29, 2008 9/29/08
== 5.0
Low August 18, 2008 8/18/08
== 5.0
Low June 30, 2008 6/30/08
== 4.0
Low June 30, 2008 6/30/08
== 5.0
Low June 25, 2008 6/25/08
== 4
== 5
Low June 2, 2008 6/2/08
== 5
High May 23, 2008 5/23/08
== 3.0
== 2.1
== 5.0
== 4.0
High May 22, 2008 5/22/08
== 5.0
Low May 8, 2008 5/8/08
== ws_3
== es_3
== as_3
High May 8, 2008 5/8/08
== as_4
== es_4
== ws_4
Low May 8, 2008 5/8/08
== as_4
== es_4
== ws_4
Medium April 4, 2008 4/4/08
== 5.0
High March 6, 2008 3/6/08
== 5.0
== 3.0
== 4.0
Low February 29, 2008 2/29/08
== 5.0
== 5
High February 5, 2008 2/5/08
== 4.0
Medium December 20, 2007 12/20/07
== 4.0
== 5.0
Low December 18, 2007 12/18/07
== 5.0
Medium December 13, 2007 12/13/07
== 5.0
Low December 3, 2007 12/3/07
== 4.0
Low November 30, 2007 11/30/07
== 4.0
== 5.0
High November 7, 2007 11/7/07
== 1.0
Low October 23, 2007 10/23/07
== 5.0
High October 11, 2007 10/11/07
== 2.1

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.