Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "enterprise_linux_for_power_big_endian_eus"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/enterprise_linux_for_power_big_endian_eus/1.2.3

redhat / enterprise_linux_for_power_big_endian_eus

20 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High October 3, 2023 10/3/23
== 8.6_ppc64le
Critical December 6, 2019 12/6/19
== 7.7_ppc64
High October 28, 2019 10/28/19
== 7.7_ppc64
High September 20, 2019 9/20/19
== 7.6_ppc64
Medium March 21, 2019 3/21/19
== 7.4
Low January 11, 2019 1/11/19
== 7.6
Low January 9, 2018 1/9/18
== 7.4
High October 4, 2017 10/4/17
== 7.4_ppc64
== 7.5_ppc64
== 7.6_ppc64
== 7.7_ppc64
High September 19, 2017 9/19/17
== 7.4_ppc64
== 7.5_ppc64
== 7.6_ppc64
== 7.7_ppc64
Medium June 13, 2016 6/13/16
== 7.2
Medium May 5, 2016 5/5/16
== 7.2_ppc64
== 7.3_ppc64
== 7.4_ppc64
== 7.5_ppc64
== 7.6_ppc64
== 7.7_ppc64
== 6.7_ppc64
Medium May 5, 2016 5/5/16
== 7.2_ppc64
== 7.3_ppc64
== 7.4_ppc64
== 7.5_ppc64
== 7.6_ppc64
== 7.7_ppc64
== 6.7_ppc64
Low May 2, 2016 5/2/16
== 7.1_ppc64
Medium October 22, 2015 10/22/15
== 7.2_ppc64
== 7.3_ppc64
== 7.4_ppc64
== 7.5_ppc64
== 6.7_ppc64
Medium August 31, 2015 8/31/15
== 7.1_ppc64
== 7.2_ppc64
== 7.3_ppc64
== 7.4_ppc64
== 7.5_ppc64
== 7.6_ppc64
== 7.7_ppc64
High August 12, 2015 8/12/15
== 7.1_ppc64
== 7.2_ppc64
== 7.3_ppc64
== 7.4_ppc64
== 7.5_ppc64
== 7.6_ppc64
== 7.7_ppc64
== 6.7_ppc64
Critical July 16, 2015 7/16/15
== 7.1_ppc64
== 7.2_ppc64
== 7.3_ppc64
== 7.4_ppc64
== 7.5_ppc64
== 6.7_ppc64
Critical September 25, 2014 9/25/14
== 7.3_ppc64
== 7.4_ppc64
== 7.5_ppc64
== 7.6_ppc64
== 7.7_ppc64
== 6.5_ppc64
Critical September 24, 2014 9/24/14
== 7.3_ppc64
== 7.4_ppc64
== 7.5_ppc64
== 7.6_ppc64
== 7.7_ppc64
== 6.5_ppc64
Medium May 16, 2013 5/16/13
== 5.9_ppc
== 6.4_ppc64

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.