Found 1 matching product.
You can search for specific versions with /product/enterprise_mrg/1.2.3
| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Medium | December 11, 2020 12/11/20 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | December 11, 2020 12/11/20 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | September 9, 2020 9/9/20 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | June 9, 2020 6/9/20 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 12, 2020 5/12/20 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | May 8, 2020 5/8/20 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | February 19, 2020 2/19/20 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Critical | November 21, 2019 11/21/19 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | November 6, 2019 11/6/19 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | November 5, 2019 11/5/19 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | November 5, 2019 11/5/19 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | June 19, 2019 6/19/19 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | June 19, 2019 6/19/19 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | April 11, 2019 4/11/19 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | December 18, 2018 12/18/18 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | July 30, 2018 7/30/18 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | February 9, 2018 2/9/18 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | January 14, 2018 1/14/18 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | January 14, 2018 1/14/18 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | October 18, 2017 10/18/17 |
== 3.0
|
|
|
|
Low | September 19, 2017 9/19/17 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | September 14, 2017 9/14/17 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 7, 2016 10/7/16 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | June 27, 2016 6/27/16 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 2, 2016 5/2/16 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | May 27, 2015 5/27/15 |
== 2.5
|
|
|
|
High | November 10, 2014 11/10/14 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | November 10, 2014 11/10/14 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 19, 2014 7/19/14 |
== 2.5
|
|
|
|
Low | July 11, 2014 7/11/14 |
== 2.5
|
|
|
|
Low | June 5, 2014 6/5/14 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | June 5, 2014 6/5/14 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | April 30, 2014 4/30/14 |
== 2.5
|
|
|
|
Low | February 10, 2014 2/10/14 |
== 1.3
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 23, 2013 12/23/13 |
== 2.4
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 23, 2013 12/23/13 |
== 2.4
|
|
|
|
Low | December 23, 2013 12/23/13 |
== 2.4
|
|
|
|
High | December 23, 2013 12/23/13 |
== 2.4
|
|
|
|
Low | October 11, 2013 10/11/13 |
== 2.3
== 2.2
== 2.1
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | October 11, 2013 10/11/13 |
== 1.1.2
== 1.0.3
== 1.2.2
== 1.1.1
== 1.0
== 1.0.2
== 1.0.1
== 1.2
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 10, 2013 10/10/13 |
== 2.4
== 2.3
== 2.2
== 2.1
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 9, 2013 10/9/13 |
== 2.4
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 1, 2013 10/1/13 |
== 2.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | August 23, 2013 8/23/13 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | July 4, 2013 7/4/13 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | April 29, 2013 4/29/13 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | April 29, 2013 4/29/13 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | March 15, 2013 3/15/13 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | March 15, 2013 3/15/13 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | March 15, 2013 3/15/13 |
== 2.0
|
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.