Vulnerabilities for products matching "freepbx"
Found 3 matching products. Filters apply to all results.
You can search for specific versions with /product/freepbx/1.2.3
coalescent_systems / freepbx
2 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
High | March 3, 2007 3/3/07 |
== 2.1.3
|
|
|
|
High | December 4, 2006 12/4/06 |
<= 2.1.3
|
freepbx / freepbx
9 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Low | June 20, 2019 6/20/19 |
== 15.0.1
|
|
|
|
High | October 7, 2014 10/7/14 |
== 2.10.0.10
== 2.10.0.3
== 2.10.0.1
== 2.11.1.1
== 2.11.1.4
== 2.11.1.3
== 2.10.0.2
== 2.10.0.8
== 2.10.0.5
== 2.10.0.6
== 2.10.0.4
== 2.10.0.7
== 2.11.1.0
== 2.10.0.0
== 2.10.0.9
== 2.11.1.2
|
|
|
|
High | February 18, 2014 2/18/14 |
== 2.12
== 2.11
== 2.10
|
|
|
|
Low | December 30, 2009 12/30/09 |
== 2.5.2
== 2.6.0-rc2
|
|
|
|
Low | May 28, 2009 5/28/09 |
== 2.5.0rc2
== 2.4.0_beta1
== 2.5.2
== 2.5.0_beta1
== 2.4.1
== 2.4.0_beta2
== 2.5.0rc3
== 2.5.1
== 2.4
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 28, 2009 5/28/09 |
== 2.5.0rc2
== 2.4.0_beta1
== 2.5.2
== 2.5.0_beta1
== 2.4.1
== 2.4.0_beta2
== 2.5.0rc3
== 2.5
== 2.5.1
== 2.4
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 28, 2009 5/28/09 |
== 2.5.0rc2
== 2.4.0_beta1
== 2.5.2
== 2.5.0_beta1
== 2.4.1
== 2.4.0_beta2
== 2.5.0rc3
== 2.5
== 2.5.1
== 2.4
|
|
|
|
Medium | April 30, 2007 4/30/07 |
<= 2.2.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | April 24, 2007 4/24/07 |
== 2.2.1
== 2.2_rc1
|
sangoma / freepbx
36 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
High | March 5, 2026 3/5/26 |
>= 16.0.17.2 < 16.0.20
>= 17.0.2.4 < 17.0.5
|
|
|
|
High | March 5, 2026 3/5/26 |
>= 16.0.17.2 < 16.0.20
>= 17.0.2.4 < 17.0.5
|
|
|
|
High | March 5, 2026 3/5/26 |
>= 16.0 < 16.0.49
>= 17.0 < 17.0.7
|
|
|
|
High | March 5, 2026 3/5/26 |
>= 16.0 < 16.0.10
>= 17.0 < 17.0.5
|
|
|
|
High | February 12, 2026 2/12/26 |
>= 16.0.2 < 16.0.17
>= 17.0.1 < 17.0.5
|
|
|
|
High | December 16, 2025 12/16/25 |
>= 16.0 < 16.0.45
>= 17.0 < 17.0.24
|
|
|
|
High | December 16, 2025 12/16/25 |
>= 16.0 < 16.0.5
>= 17.0 < 17.0.5
|
|
|
|
High | December 11, 2025 12/11/25 |
== 16.0
|
|
|
|
Critical | December 9, 2025 12/9/25 |
< 16.0.44
>= 17.0.1 < 17.0.23
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 14, 2025 10/14/25 |
< 16.0.68.39
>= 17.0.1 < 17.0.18.38
|
|
|
|
High | September 15, 2025 9/15/25 |
>= 17.0.19.11 < 17.0.21
|
|
|
|
High | September 15, 2025 9/15/25 |
>= 15.0 < 15.0.38
>= 16.0 < 16.0.41
>= 17.0 < 17.0.21
|
|
|
|
Critical | August 28, 2025 8/28/25 |
>= 15.0 < 15.0.66
>= 16.0 < 16.0.89
>= 17.0 < 17.0.3
|
|
|
|
Low | December 2, 2024 12/2/24 |
== 17.0.19.17
|
|
|
|
High | November 2, 2023 11/2/23 |
>= 16.0.2 < 16.0.17
< 15.0.16
>= 16.0.2 < 16.0.40
< 15.0.18
|
|
|
|
Low | December 27, 2022 12/27/22 |
< 13.0.5.4
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 25, 2022 12/25/22 |
>= 14.0 < 14.0.5.21
|
|
|
|
High | March 16, 2020 3/16/20 |
< 13.0.92
>= 14.0.0.0 < 14.0.38.3
>= 15.0.0.0 < 15.0.13.6
|
|
|
|
Low | March 16, 2020 3/16/20 |
>= 14.0.10.2 <= 14.0.10.7
|
|
|
|
Low | March 16, 2020 3/16/20 |
>= 14.0 <= 14.0.2.14
>= 15.0 <= 15.0.15.4
>= 13.0 <= 13.0.26.9
|
|
|
|
Low | March 16, 2020 3/16/20 |
<= 13.0.4.7
>= 14.0.0.0 <= 14.0.24
>= 15.0.0.0 <= 15.0.2.20
|
|
|
|
Low | December 6, 2019 12/6/19 |
>= 15.0 <= 15.0.20
>= 14.0 <= 14.0.7
>= 13.0 <= 13.0.76.43
|
|
|
|
Low | December 6, 2019 12/6/19 |
>= 15.0 <= 15.0.20
>= 14.0 <= 14.0.7
>= 13.0 <= 13.0.76.43
|
|
|
|
Critical | November 21, 2019 11/21/19 |
>= 13.0.0.0 <= 13.0.197.13
>= 14.0.0.0 <= 14.0.13.11
>= 15.0.0.0 <= 15.0.16.26
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 21, 2019 10/21/19 |
< 14.0.10.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 21, 2019 10/21/19 |
== 14.0.10.3
|
|
|
|
Low | June 20, 2019 6/20/19 |
< 13.0.122.43
>= 14.0.0 < 14.0.18.34
== 15.0.1-beta4
>= 15.0.0 <= 15.0.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 29, 2018 1/29/18 |
== 10.13.66
== 14.0.1.24
|
|
|
|
High | October 7, 2014 10/7/14 |
<= 2.9.0.8
== 2.11.0.0
== 2.11.0.1
== 2.11.0.2
== 2.11.0.3
== 2.11.0.4
|
|
|
|
High | February 18, 2014 2/18/14 |
== 2.9
|
|
|
|
High | September 6, 2012 9/6/12 |
== 2.9
<= 2.10
|
|
|
|
Low | September 6, 2012 9/6/12 |
<= 2.9
|
|
|
|
Medium | September 28, 2010 9/28/10 |
<= 2.8.0
|
|
|
|
Low | May 28, 2009 5/28/09 |
== 2.4.0
== 2.5.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 28, 2009 5/28/09 |
== 2.4.0
== 2.5.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 28, 2009 5/28/09 |
== 2.4.0
== 2.5.0
|
Showing vulnerabilities for 3 products matching "freepbx". Each product has independent pagination.
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.