Vulnerability Database

413,619

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "github.com-canonical-lxd"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/github.com-canonical-lxd/1.2.3

Go icon

github.com/canonical/lxd

26 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected versions
Critical November 6, 2026 11/6/26
< 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1
High November 6, 2026 11/6/26
< 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1
High November 6, 2026 11/6/26
< 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1
Medium November 6, 2026 11/6/26
< 0.0.0-20260622081844-85f897013ccd
Critical November 6, 2026 11/6/26
< 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1
Critical November 6, 2026 11/6/26
< 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1
Critical November 6, 2026 11/6/26
< 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1
Critical November 6, 2026 11/6/26
< 0.0.0-20260203144152-d1c8ba15d160
Critical November 6, 2026 11/6/26
< 0.0.0-20260626085134-124f90100640
Medium November 6, 2026 11/6/26
< 0.0.0-20261005133302-c4a919f3f4e2
High November 5, 2026 11/5/26
>= 0.0.0-20250721152936-fe86ceb2c3fa, < 0.0.0-20260626085133-7cb96ac80a6d
Critical April 10, 2026 4/10/26
>= 0.0.0-20210305023314-538ac3df036e, <= 0.0.0-20260226085519-736f34afb267
Critical April 10, 2026 4/10/26
>= 0.0.0-20210305023314-538ac3df036e, <= 0.0.0-20260226085519-736f34afb267
Critical April 10, 2026 4/10/26
>= 0.0.0-20210305023314-538ac3df036e, <= 0.0.0-20260226085519-736f34afb267
Medium March 4, 2026 3/4/26
< 0.0.0-20260224152359-d936c90d47cf
High November 13, 2025 11/13/25
< 0.0.0-20251110144034-698854d0164f
High November 13, 2025 11/13/25
< 0.0.0-20251110144034-698854d0164f
High October 2, 2025 10/2/25
>= 5.0, < 5.0.5
>= 5.1, < 5.21.4
>= 6.0, < 6.5
>= 0.0.0-20220401034332-1e1349e3cbf3, < 0.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e41
Medium October 2, 2025 10/2/25
>= 4.0, < 5.21.4
>= 6.0, < 6.5
>= 0.0.0-20200331193331-03aab09f5b5c, < 0.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e41
High October 2, 2025 10/2/25
>= 4.0, < 5.21.4
>= 6.0, < 6.5
>= 0.0.0-20200331193331-03aab09f5b5c, < 0.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e41
Medium October 2, 2025 10/2/25
>= 4.0, < 5.21.4
>= 6.0, < 6.5
>= 0.0.0-20200331193331-03aab09f5b5c, < 0.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e41
High October 2, 2025 10/2/25
>= 4.0, < 5.21.4
>= 6.0, < 6.5
>= 0.0.0-20200331193331-03aab09f5b5c, < 0.0.0-20250224180022-ec09b24179f3
Medium October 2, 2025 10/2/25
>= 4.0, < 5.21.4
>= 6.0, < 6.5
>= 0.0.0-20200331193331-03aab09f5b5c, < 0.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e41
Low December 9, 2024 12/9/24
< 0.0.0-20240708073652-5a492a3f0036
Low December 9, 2024 12/9/24
< 0.0.0-20240403103450-0e7f2b5bf4d2
Low December 5, 2023 12/5/23
>= 5.19.0, < 5.20.0
>= 0.0.0-20230920084527-cbe39c5d3f14, < 0.0.0-20240118092008-ce1bd0dd37bb
= 5.19.0

Running lxd on internet-facing hosts?

Knowing a product's CVEs is half the job; the other half is knowing every place it is exposed. Attack surface management continuously maps your external assets and the software they run.

What is attack surface management? →

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.