Found 1 matching product.
You can search for specific versions with /product/glassfish_server/1.2.3
| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Medium | June 25, 2021 6/25/21 |
<= 3.1.2.18
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 17, 2018 10/17/18 |
== 3.1.2
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 17, 2018 10/17/18 |
== 3.1.2
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 17, 2018 10/17/18 |
== 3.1.2
|
|
|
|
High | July 16, 2018 7/16/18 |
== 5.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 19, 2017 10/19/17 |
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
High | October 19, 2017 10/19/17 |
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 19, 2017 10/19/17 |
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 19, 2017 10/19/17 |
== 3.1.2
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 17, 2017 7/17/17 |
== 4.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 17, 2017 7/17/17 |
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 17, 2017 7/17/17 |
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Low | April 24, 2017 4/24/17 |
== 3.1.2
|
|
|
|
Low | January 27, 2017 1/27/17 |
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Low | January 27, 2017 1/27/17 |
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
High | January 27, 2017 1/27/17 |
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
High | January 27, 2017 1/27/17 |
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 27, 2017 1/27/17 |
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 25, 2016 10/25/16 |
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 21, 2016 7/21/16 |
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 21, 2016 7/21/16 |
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
High | July 21, 2016 7/21/16 |
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | March 13, 2016 3/13/16 |
== 2.1.1
|
|
|
|
High | November 5, 2015 11/5/15 |
== 2.1.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | June 22, 2015 6/22/15 |
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Low | April 17, 2013 4/17/13 |
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Low | February 8, 2013 2/8/13 |
== 2.1.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 16, 2012 10/16/12 |
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 3, 2012 5/3/12 |
== 3.1.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 3, 2012 5/3/12 |
== 3.1.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 18, 2012 1/18/12 |
== 3.0.1
== 3.1.1
|
|
|
|
Low | January 18, 2012 1/18/12 |
== 3.1.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 30, 2011 12/30/11 |
<= 3.1.1
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
High | October 18, 2011 10/18/11 |
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.1
== 3.1.1
|
|
|
|
High | April 20, 2011 4/20/11 |
== 2.1
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 19, 2011 1/19/11 |
== 2.1
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Low | July 13, 2010 7/13/10 |
== 2.1.1
|
|
|
|
Low | May 6, 2009 5/6/09 |
== 2.1
|
|
|
|
Low | November 28, 2008 11/28/08 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | June 18, 2008 6/18/08 |
== 3.0
== 1.0-ur1_po1
== 2.1
== 2.1.1
== 1.0-ur1
== 3.0.1
== 2.0
== 1.0
|
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.