Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "glassfish_server"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/glassfish_server/1.2.3

oracle / glassfish_server

40 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium June 25, 2021 6/25/21
<= 3.1.2.18
Medium October 17, 2018 10/17/18
== 3.1.2
Medium October 17, 2018 10/17/18
== 3.1.2
Medium October 17, 2018 10/17/18
== 3.1.2
High July 16, 2018 7/16/18
== 5.0
Medium October 19, 2017 10/19/17
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
High October 19, 2017 10/19/17
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
Medium October 19, 2017 10/19/17
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
Medium October 19, 2017 10/19/17
== 3.1.2
Medium July 17, 2017 7/17/17
== 4.1
Medium July 17, 2017 7/17/17
== 3.0.1
Medium July 17, 2017 7/17/17
== 3.0.1
Low April 24, 2017 4/24/17
== 3.1.2
Low January 27, 2017 1/27/17
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
Low January 27, 2017 1/27/17
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
High January 27, 2017 1/27/17
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
High January 27, 2017 1/27/17
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
Medium January 27, 2017 1/27/17
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
Medium October 25, 2016 10/25/16
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
Medium July 21, 2016 7/21/16
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.1
Medium July 21, 2016 7/21/16
== 3.0.1
High July 21, 2016 7/21/16
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
Medium March 13, 2016 3/13/16
== 2.1.1
High November 5, 2015 11/5/15
== 2.1.1
Medium June 22, 2015 6/22/15
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
Low April 17, 2013 4/17/13
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
Low February 8, 2013 2/8/13
== 2.1.1
Medium October 16, 2012 10/16/12
== 2.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.1
Medium May 3, 2012 5/3/12
== 3.1.1
Medium May 3, 2012 5/3/12
== 3.1.1
Medium January 18, 2012 1/18/12
== 3.0.1
== 3.1.1
Low January 18, 2012 1/18/12
== 3.1.1
Medium December 30, 2011 12/30/11
<= 3.1.1
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.1
High October 18, 2011 10/18/11
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.1
== 3.1.1
High April 20, 2011 4/20/11
== 2.1
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.1
Medium January 19, 2011 1/19/11
== 2.1
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.1
Low July 13, 2010 7/13/10
== 2.1.1
Low May 6, 2009 5/6/09
== 2.1
Low November 28, 2008 11/28/08
== 2.0
Low June 18, 2008 6/18/08
== 3.0
== 1.0-ur1_po1
== 2.1
== 2.1.1
== 1.0-ur1
== 3.0.1
== 2.0
== 1.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.