Vulnerability Database

328,411

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "ichitaro"

Found 3 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/ichitaro/1.2.3

justsystem / ichitaro

7 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High January 10, 2008 1/10/08
== linux
== 2007
== 11.0
== 2006
== 2005
== 12.0
== 13.0
== 2004
High December 18, 2007 12/18/07
== 2007
== 2006
== 2005
High October 28, 2007 10/28/07
== lite2
== linux
== 11.0
== 2006
== 2005
== 12.0
== 13.0
== 2004
Medium August 8, 2007 8/8/07
== 2007
Medium December 10, 2006 12/10/06
*
== 2006
== 2005
Medium October 20, 2006 10/20/06
== 2006
== 2006_government_edition
== 2006_trial_edition
High August 24, 2006 8/24/06
== 9.0
== 10.0
== 11.0
== 2006
== 2005
== 12.0
== 13.0
== 2004

ichitaro / ichitaro

2 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High March 24, 2009 3/24/09
== 13
== 2004
== 2005
== 2006
== 2007
== 2008
== lite2
Low April 10, 2007 4/10/07
== 2006
== 2005
== 2007

justsystems / ichitaro

17 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High February 24, 2017 2/24/17
*
High February 24, 2017 2/24/17
*
Medium February 24, 2017 2/24/17
== 2016
High November 26, 2014 11/26/14
== 2010
== 2014
== 2012
== 2009
== 2008
== 6
== 7
== 2011
== 2013
High June 16, 2014 6/16/14
== 2009
== 13
== 2012
== 2006
== 2011
<= 2014
== 2008
== 2005
== 10
== 12
== 2010
== 2013
== 2007
== 11
== 2004
High November 13, 2013 11/13/13
== 2012
== 2013
== 2011
== 7
== 2006
== 2010
== 2007
== 2009
== 6
== 2008
High June 18, 2013 6/18/13
== 7
== 2012
== 2006
== 2011
== 2013
== 2008
== 2010
== 2007
== 2009
== 6
High March 1, 2013 3/1/13
== 2006
== 2007
High April 27, 2012 4/27/12
== 2006
== 2011
== 2008
== 2010
== 2007
== 2009
Medium April 27, 2012 4/27/12
== 2006
== 2011
== 2008
== 2010
== 2007
== 2009
High July 18, 2011 7/18/11
== 2006
== 2011
== 2008
== 2005
== 2010
== 2007
== 2009
== 6
High November 6, 2010 11/6/10
*
== 2007
== 2009
== 2008
High November 6, 2010 11/6/10
*
== 2007
== 2009
== 2008
High June 3, 2010 6/3/10
== 2008
== 2005
== 2007
== 2009
== 2006
== 2004
High April 15, 2010 4/15/10
== 2009
== 2010
== 2006
== 2008
== 2007
High April 6, 2010 4/6/10
== 2009
== 13
== 2006
== bungei
== 2008
== 2005
== 2007
== 2004
High September 4, 2008 9/4/08
*

Showing vulnerabilities for 3 products matching "ichitaro". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.