Vulnerability Database

347,064

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "internet_explorer"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/internet_explorer/1.2.3

microsoft / internet_explorer

5549 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 5.01
<= 5.5
Medium June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 5.01
== 5.5
Medium June 27, 2001 6/27/01
== 5.01
<= 5.5
High June 27, 2001 6/27/01
<= 5.5
Medium June 2, 2001 6/2/01
<= 5.5
Medium June 2, 2001 6/2/01
<= 5.5
Medium June 2, 2001 6/2/01
== 4.0
Low May 11, 2001 5/11/01
== 5.5-sp2
== 5.0
== 5.0.1
== 5.0.1-sp2
== 5.0.1-sp1
== 5.5
== 5.5-sp1
== 6.0
High May 3, 2001 5/3/01
== 5.01
<= 5.5
High April 20, 2001 4/20/01
== 5.0
== 5.5
Low February 16, 2001 2/16/01
== 5.01
== 5.0
<= 5.5
Medium February 16, 2001 2/16/01
== 5.5
Low February 16, 2001 2/16/01
== 5.01
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 5.5
Low February 16, 2001 2/16/01
== 5.01
== 5.0
== 5.5
High December 19, 2000 12/19/00
== 5.01
== 4.0
== 4.0.1
== 4.1
== 5.0
Low October 20, 2000 10/20/00
== 5.01
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 5.5
Low October 20, 2000 10/20/00
== 5.01
== 4.0
== 5.5
Medium July 14, 2000 7/14/00
== 5.01
== 5.5
High June 27, 2000 6/27/00
== 5
== 4.0.1-sp2
Low June 6, 2000 6/6/00
== 5.01
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 5.5-preview
Low June 5, 2000 6/5/00
== 4.0
Low June 5, 2000 6/5/00
== 4.0
High May 17, 2000 5/17/00
== 5.01
== 4.0
== 4.0.1
== 5.0
Medium May 17, 2000 5/17/00
== 5.01
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 5.5-preview
High May 13, 2000 5/13/00
== 5
Low May 11, 2000 5/11/00
== 3.0
== 3.2
== 4.0
== 4.0.1
== 4.1
== 5.0
Low April 18, 2000 4/18/00
== 5.01
== 5.0
Medium March 1, 2000 3/1/00
== 5.01
== 5.0
High February 21, 2000 2/21/00
== 5
Medium February 18, 2000 2/18/00
== 4.0
Medium February 16, 2000 2/16/00
== 5.01
== 4.0
== 4.0.1
== 5.0
High January 7, 2000 1/7/00
== 5.01
== 4.0
== 4.0.1
== 5.0
== 5.5-preview
High January 4, 2000 1/4/00
== 4.0
== 4.1
High December 31, 1999 12/31/99
== 4.0
== 4.0.1
== 4.0.1-sp1
Medium December 31, 1999 12/31/99
== 4.0
== 4.0.1
<= 4.0.1
High December 31, 1999 12/31/99
<= 4.0.1
Medium December 31, 1999 12/31/99
== 4.0
Medium December 31, 1999 12/31/99
== 3.0.2
== 4.0
Low December 23, 1999 12/23/99
== 3.0.2
== 3.0
== 3.1
== 3.2
== 4.0
== 4.0.1-sp2
== 4.1
== 4.5
== 5.0
== 5.1
Medium December 8, 1999 12/8/99
== 4.0.1
== 5.0
<= 5.01
Medium December 2, 1999 12/2/99
== 5.0
Low November 17, 1999 11/17/99
== 4.0.1
== 5.0
Medium November 14, 1999 11/14/99
== 5.0
Medium November 11, 1999 11/11/99
== 4.0
High November 1, 1999 11/1/99
== 4.0
== 5.0
Low November 1, 1999 11/1/99
== 3.0.2
== 3.0
== 3.1
== 3.2
== 4.0
== 4.0.1-sp2
== 4.1
== 4.5
== 5.0
Medium October 31, 1999 10/31/99
== 4.0.1
== 5.0
Low October 1, 1999 10/1/99
== 4.01
== 4.01-sp1
== 5.0
Medium September 24, 1999 9/24/99
== 4.0.1
== 5.0
High September 10, 1999 9/10/99
== 4.0.1
== 5.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.