Vulnerability Database

325,648

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "java_system_application_server"

Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/java_system_application_server/1.2.3

sun / java_system_application_server

22 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium October 16, 2012 10/16/12
== 8.2
== 8.1
High April 20, 2011 4/20/11
== 9.1
Low January 25, 2010 1/25/10
== 7.0
Medium January 27, 2009 1/27/09
== 8.1
== 8.2
Low November 28, 2008 11/28/08
== 9.1_01-b09d-fcs
== 9.1_02-b04-fcs
Low June 18, 2008 6/18/08
== 9.1_01
Medium May 9, 2008 5/9/08
<= 7.0
High October 1, 2007 10/1/07
== 9.1
Medium October 1, 2007 10/1/07
== 8.1-ur1
== 8.2
== 8.1
Medium August 23, 2007 8/23/07
== 9.0_0.1
Low July 26, 2007 7/26/07
== 8.1
== 8.2
== 9.0
== 8.1-ur1
High July 11, 2007 7/11/07
== 8.2
== 9.0
Medium December 4, 2006 12/4/06
== 8.1
== 7.0
Low July 28, 2006 7/28/06
== 7.0-ur5
== 7.0
== 7.0-ur1
== 7.0-ur2
== 8.1
== 7.1
== 7.0-ur6
== 8.1-ur1
== 7.0-ur4
Low June 26, 2006 6/26/06
<= 7.0
== 8.1
Medium May 20, 2006 5/20/06
<= 7.0
Medium December 31, 2005 12/31/05
== 8.1
== 8.1-ur1
Medium December 31, 2005 12/31/05
== 7.0-ur5
== 7.0
== 7.0-ur1
== 7.0-ur2
== 7.0-ur6
== 6.0
== 7.0-ur4
Low December 7, 2005 12/7/05
== 8.1
== 7.0
Low May 2, 2005 5/2/05
== 7.0-ur5
== 7.0
== 7.0-ur1
== 7.0-ur4
High December 31, 2004 12/31/04
== 7.0
== 7.1
== 7.0-ur4
Medium December 31, 2004 12/31/04
== 7.0

oracle / java_system_application_server

2 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High October 18, 2011 10/18/11
== 8.1
== 8.2
Low July 13, 2010 7/13/10
== 8.0
== 8.1
== 8.2

Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "java_system_application_server". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.