Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "konqueror"

Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/konqueror/1.2.3

kde / konqueror

33 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low July 20, 2009 7/20/09
*
Medium December 24, 2008 12/24/08
== 3.5.9
Low December 22, 2008 12/22/08
*
Medium October 2, 2008 10/2/08
== 3.5.9
Low December 28, 2007 12/28/07
== 3.95.00
== 3.5.5
Medium November 15, 2007 11/15/07
<= 3.5.6
Low August 8, 2007 8/8/07
<= 3.5.7
Low August 8, 2007 8/8/07
== 3.5.7
Medium August 8, 2007 8/8/07
== 3.5.7
Low July 17, 2007 7/17/07
== 3.5.7
Medium June 11, 2007 6/11/07
== 3.5.5
Medium April 22, 2007 4/22/07
== 3.5.5
Medium March 21, 2007 3/21/07
== 3.5.5
High March 21, 2007 3/21/07
== 3.5.5
Low March 7, 2007 3/7/07
== 3.5.5
Low January 29, 2007 1/29/07
== 3.5.5
Low July 18, 2006 7/18/06
== 3.2.2.6
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.2
== 3.3
== 2.2.2
== 3.1
== 3.0
== 3.3.1
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.3
== 3.1.1
== 2.1.2
<= 3.5.1
== 3.2.3
== 3.0.5b
== 2.2.1
== 3.1.3
== 3.3.2
== 3.1.4
== 3.2.1
== 3.1.5
== 3.2.2
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.5
Medium December 31, 2005 12/31/05
== 3.2.2.6
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.2
== 3.3
== 2.2.2
== 3.1
== 3.0
== 3.3.1
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.3
== 3.1.1
== 2.1.2
== 3.2.3
== 3.0.5b
== 2.2.1
== 3.1.3
== 0.1
== 3.3.2
== 3.1.4
== 3.2.1
== 3.1.5
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.5
Medium May 2, 2005 5/2/05
== 3.2.1
High January 10, 2005 1/10/05
== 3.2.2.6
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.2
== 3.3
== 2.2.2
== 3.1
== 3.0
== 3.3.1
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.3
== 3.1.1
== 2.1.2
== 3.2.3
== 3.0.5b
== 2.2.1
== 3.1.3
== 3.3.2
== 3.1.4
== 3.2.1
== 3.1.5
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.5
High January 10, 2005 1/10/05
== 3.3.1
High December 23, 2004 12/23/04
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.2
== 2.2.2
== 3.1
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.3
== 3.1.1
== 2.1.2
== 3.2.3
== 3.0.5b
== 2.2.1
== 3.1.3
== 3.1.4
== 3.2.1
== 3.1.5
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.5
High October 20, 2004 10/20/04
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.2
== 3.0.3
== 3.0.5
== 3.0.5b
== 3.1
== 3.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.1.3
== 3.1.5
== 3.2.1
== 3.2.3
High September 16, 2004 9/16/04
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.2
== 2.2.2
== 3.1
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.3
== 3.1.1
== 2.1.2
== 3.2.3
== 3.0.5b
== 2.2.1
== 3.1.3
== 3.1.4
== 3.2.1
== 3.1.5
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.5
Medium September 16, 2004 9/16/04
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.2
== 2.2.2
== 3.1
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.3
== 3.1.1
== 2.1.2
== 3.2.3
== 3.0.5b
== 2.2.1
== 3.1.3
== 3.1.4
== 3.2.1
== 3.1.5
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.5
Medium August 6, 2004 8/6/04
== 2.1.1
== 2.2.2
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.2
== 3.0.3
== 3.0.5
== 3.1
== 3.1.1
== 3.1.2
== 3.1.3
== 3.2.1
High July 27, 2004 7/27/04
== 3.1.3
== 3.2.2
High July 7, 2004 7/7/04
<= 3.2.2
High April 15, 2004 4/15/04
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.2
== 2.2.2
== 3.1
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.3
== 3.1.1
== 2.1.1
== 3.0.5
Low December 31, 2003 12/31/03
== 3.0.3
Medium August 27, 2003 8/27/03
== 3.1.2
== 3.0.2
== 2.2.2
== 3.1
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.3
== 3.1.1
== 3.0.5
== 2.1.1
High October 11, 2002 10/11/02
== 3.0.2
== 2.2.2
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.3
High September 24, 2002 9/24/02
== 3.0.2
== 2.2.2
== 3.0
== 3.0.1

konqueror / konqueror

1 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium October 9, 2008 10/9/08
== 3.5.9

Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "konqueror". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.