Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "libreoffice"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/libreoffice/1.2.3

libreoffice / libreoffice

69 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium December 15, 2025 12/15/25
>= 25.2.0.1 < 25.2.4.1
Medium April 27, 2025 4/27/25
>= 25.2.0.1 < 25.2.2
== 25.2.0.0-alpha1
== 25.2.0.0-beta1
>= 24.8.0.1 < 24.8.6.0
== 24.8.0.0-alpha1
== 24.8.0.0-beta1
Medium March 21, 2025 3/21/25
>= 7.0.0 < 7.0.5.1
>= 7.1.0.0 <= 7.1.1.1
High March 4, 2025 3/4/25
>= 24.8.0.0 < 24.8.5.1
>= 25.2.0.0 < 25.2.1.1
High February 25, 2025 2/25/25
>= 24.8.0.0 < 24.8.5.1
Medium January 7, 2025 1/7/25
>= 24.8.0.1 < 24.8.4
== 24.8.0.0-alpha1
== 24.8.0.0-beta1
Low January 7, 2025 1/7/25
>= 24.8.0.1 < 24.8.4
== 24.8.0.0-alpha1
== 24.8.0.0-beta1
High September 17, 2024 9/17/24
>= 24.2.0 < 24.2.5
High August 5, 2024 8/5/24
>= 24.2.0.0 < 24.2.5.1
Critical June 25, 2024 6/25/24
< 24.2.4
Medium May 14, 2024 5/14/24
< 7.6.7.1
>= 24.2.0.0 < 24.2.3.1
High December 11, 2023 12/11/23
>= 7.5.0 < 7.5.9
>= 7.6.0 < 7.6.4
High December 11, 2023 12/11/23
>= 7.6.0 < 7.6.3
>= 7.5.0 < 7.5.9
Medium July 10, 2023 7/10/23
== 7.5.0
< 7.4.6
Medium May 25, 2023 5/25/23
>= 7.5.0 < 7.5.3
>= 7.4.0 < 7.4.7
High May 25, 2023 5/25/23
>= 7.5.0 < 7.5.2
>= 7.4.0 < 7.4.6
Medium October 11, 2022 10/11/22
== 7.4.0
>= 7.3.0 < 7.3.6
High July 25, 2022 7/25/22
>= 7.2.0 < 7.2.7
>= 7.3.0 < 7.3.2
High July 25, 2022 7/25/22
>= 7.2.0 < 7.2.7
>= 7.3.0 < 7.3.3
High July 25, 2022 7/25/22
>= 7.2.0 < 7.2.7
>= 7.3.0 < 7.3.3
High February 24, 2022 2/24/22
>= 7.2.0 < 7.2.5
High October 12, 2021 10/12/21
>= 7.1.0 < 7.1.2
>= 7.0.0 < 7.0.6
High October 11, 2021 10/11/21
>= 7.1.0 < 7.1.2
>= 7.0.0 < 7.0.6
High May 3, 2021 5/3/21
>= 7.1.0 < 7.1.2
>= 7.0.0 < 7.0.5
Medium January 7, 2021 1/7/21
== 6.0.6.2
== 6.1.3.2
== 6.1.0.3
Medium June 8, 2020 6/8/20
< 6.4.4
Medium June 8, 2020 6/8/20
< 6.4.4
Medium May 18, 2020 5/18/20
>= 6.4.0 < 6.4.3
>= 6.3.0 < 6.3.6
High September 27, 2019 9/27/19
>= 6.3.0 < 6.3.1
>= 6.2.0 < 6.2.6
Critical September 6, 2019 9/6/19
>= 6.2.0 < 6.2.7
>= 6.3.0 < 6.3.1
High September 6, 2019 9/6/19
>= 6.2.0 < 6.2.7
>= 6.3.0 < 6.3.1
Critical August 15, 2019 8/15/19
< 6.2.6
Critical August 15, 2019 8/15/19
< 6.2.6
High August 15, 2019 8/15/19
< 6.2.6
Critical July 17, 2019 7/17/19
< 6.2.5
Low July 17, 2019 7/17/19
< 6.2.5
Medium May 9, 2019 5/9/19
< 6.1.6
>= 6.2 < 6.2.3
High March 25, 2019 3/25/19
< 6.0.7
>= 6.1.0 < 6.1.3
High August 5, 2018 8/5/18
<= 6.0.5
Medium May 1, 2018 5/1/18
== 6.0.3
Medium April 16, 2018 4/16/18
>= 6.0.0 < 6.0.1.1
< 5.4.5.1
Medium April 16, 2018 4/16/18
>= 6.0.0 < 6.0.2.1
< 5.4.6.1
Medium February 9, 2018 2/9/18
== 6.0.0
< 5.4.5
== 6.0.0-alpha1
== 6.0.0-beta1
== 6.0.0-beta2
High September 9, 2017 9/9/17
<= 5.3.6
High April 30, 2017 4/30/17
<= 5.2.6
High April 15, 2017 4/15/17
<= 5.2.6
High April 14, 2017 4/14/17
<= 5.3.0.0
High April 14, 2017 4/14/17
<= 5.2.6.1
High April 14, 2017 4/14/17
<= 5.3.0.0
Medium July 8, 2016 7/8/16
<= 5.1.3

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.