Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "libxml2"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/libxml2/1.2.3

xmlsoft / libxml2

99 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium September 10, 2025 9/10/25
< 2.10.0
High June 12, 2025 6/12/25
< 2.14.4
Low April 17, 2025 4/17/25
< 2.13.8
>= 2.14.0 < 2.14.2
Medium April 8, 2025 4/8/25
< 2.13.8
>= 2.14.0 < 2.14.2
Low February 18, 2025 2/18/25
< 2.12.10
>= 2.13.0 < 2.13.6
High February 18, 2025 2/18/25
< 2.12.10
>= 2.13.0 < 2.13.6
High February 18, 2025 2/18/25
< 2.12.10
>= 2.13.0 < 2.13.6
High January 26, 2025 1/26/25
< 2.11.0
Critical December 23, 2024 12/23/24
>= 2.11.0 < 2.11.9
>= 2.12.0 < 2.12.9
>= 2.13.0 < 2.13.3
High May 14, 2024 5/14/24
< 2.11.8
>= 2.12.0 < 2.12.7
High February 4, 2024 2/4/24
>= 2.12.0 < 2.12.5
< 2.11.7
Medium October 6, 2023 10/6/23
<= 2.11.5
Medium August 29, 2023 8/29/23
== 2.11.0
Medium April 24, 2023 4/24/23
< 2.10.4
Medium April 24, 2023 4/24/23
< 2.10.4
High November 23, 2022 11/23/22
< 2.10.3
High November 23, 2022 11/23/22
< 2.10.3
Medium July 28, 2022 7/28/22
>= 2.9.2 < 2.9.11
Medium May 3, 2022 5/3/22
< 2.9.14
High February 26, 2022 2/26/22
< 2.9.13
Medium July 9, 2021 7/9/21
< 2.9.11
High May 19, 2021 5/19/21
< 2.9.11
High May 18, 2021 5/18/21
< 2.9.11
Medium May 14, 2021 5/14/21
< 2.9.11
Medium September 4, 2020 9/4/20
== 2.9.10
High January 21, 2020 1/21/20
== 2.9.10
High January 21, 2020 1/21/20
== 2.9.10
High December 24, 2019 12/24/19
< 2.9.10
Medium August 28, 2018 8/28/18
< 2.9.5
Low August 16, 2018 8/16/18
== 2.9.8
Medium August 16, 2018 8/16/18
< 2.9.4
Medium August 16, 2018 8/16/18
< 2.9.4
Medium July 30, 2018 7/30/18
== 2.9.3
Medium July 19, 2018 7/19/18
<= 2.9.8
Low April 8, 2018 4/8/18
< 2.9.6
Low April 4, 2018 4/4/18
== 2.9.8
Critical February 19, 2018 2/19/18
<= 2.9.4
== 2.9.4-rc1
== 2.9.4-rc2
High February 19, 2018 2/19/18
< 2.9.5
High February 7, 2018 2/7/18
< 2.9.5
High November 23, 2017 11/23/17
<= 2.9.4
High November 23, 2017 11/23/17
<= 2.9.4
Medium May 18, 2017 5/18/17
== 2.9.4
High May 18, 2017 5/18/17
== 2.9.4
High May 18, 2017 5/18/17
== 2.9.4
High May 18, 2017 5/18/17
== 2.9.4
Critical May 10, 2017 5/10/17
== 2.9.4
High April 11, 2017 4/11/17
< 2.9.4
Low April 11, 2017 4/11/17
== 2.9.4
Medium November 16, 2016 11/16/16
<= 2.9.4
High September 25, 2016 9/25/16
< 2.9.5

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.