Vulnerability Database

326,972

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "lighttpd"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/lighttpd/1.2.3

lighttpd / lighttpd

35 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Critical November 3, 2025 11/3/25
== 1.4.80
High October 6, 2022 10/6/22
>= 1.4.56 < 1.4.67
High September 12, 2022 9/12/22
== 1.4.65
High June 11, 2022 6/11/22
== 1.4.57
== 1.4.58
== 1.4.56
Medium January 6, 2022 1/6/22
>= 1.4.46 <= 1.4.63
High April 10, 2019 4/10/19
<= 1.4.53
High November 7, 2018 11/7/18
< 1.4.50
Medium June 9, 2015 6/9/15
<= 1.4.35
Critical March 14, 2014 3/14/14
< 1.4.35
Medium March 14, 2014 3/14/14
< 1.4.35
High November 20, 2013 11/20/13
< 1.4.33
Medium November 20, 2013 11/20/13
< 1.4.33
High November 8, 2013 11/8/13
>= 1.4.24 <= 1.4.33
Low March 21, 2013 3/21/13
<= 1.4.27
== 1.3.16
== 1.4.3
== 1.4.4
== 1.4.5
== 1.4.6
== 1.4.7
== 1.4.8
== 1.4.9
== 1.4.10
== 1.4.11
== 1.4.12
== 1.4.13
== 1.4.15
== 1.4.16
== 1.4.18
== 1.4.19
== 1.4.20
== 1.4.21
== 1.4.22
== 1.4.23
== 1.4.24
== 1.4.25
== 1.4.26
Medium November 24, 2012 11/24/12
== 1.4.32
== 1.4.31
Medium December 24, 2011 12/24/11
== 1.5.0
>= 1.4.1 < 1.4.30
Medium February 3, 2010 2/3/10
== 1.4.3
== 1.2.3
== 1.4.21
== 1.2.5
== 1.4.18
== 1.3.6
== 1.3.12
== 1.3.15
== 1.2.2
== 1.3.0
== 1.0.3
== 1.4.8
== 1.1.6
== 1.4.17
== 1.4.4
== 1.1.5
== 1.4.24
== 1.3.9
== 1.3.5
== 1.1.1
== 1.2.8
== 1.3.13
== 1.2.6
== 1.3.4
== 1.4.11
== 1.4.2
== 1.4.19
== 1.2.1
== 1.3.14
== 1.1.4
== 1.4.23
== 1.1.9
== 1.5.0
== 1.4.20
== 1.4.14
== 1.4.10
== 1.1.3
== 1.4.5
== 1.1.0
== 1.3.3
== 1.4.16
== 1.3.8
== 1.0.2
== 1.1.7
<= 1.4.25
== 1.2.0
== 1.1.8
== 1.3.11
== 1.3.16
== 1.3.1
== 1.4.12
== 1.4.9
== 1.3.10
== 1.1.2
== 1.4.7
== 1.4.6
== 1.4.22
== 1.2.7
== 1.4.15
== 1.4.13
== 1.3.2
== 1.4.0
High October 3, 2008 10/3/08
< 1.4.20
High October 3, 2008 10/3/08
< 1.4.20
Medium September 27, 2008 9/27/08
== 1.4.3
== 1.2.3
== 1.2.5
== 1.4.18
== 1.3.6
== 1.3.12
== 1.3.15
== 1.4.1
== 1.2.2
== 1.3.0
<= 1.4.19
== 1.4.8
== 1.1.6
== 1.4.17
== 1.4.4
== 1.1.5
== 1.3.9
== 1.2.4
== 1.3.5
== 1.1.1
== 1.2.8
== 1.3.13
== 1.2.6
== 1.3.4
== 1.4.11
== 1.4.2
== 1.2.1
== 1.3.14
== 1.1.4
== 1.1.9
== 1.4.14
== 1.4.10
== 1.1.3
== 1.4.5
== 1.3.3
== 1.4.16
== 1.3.8
== 1.1.7
== 1.1.8
== 1.3.11
== 1.3.16
== 1.3.1
== 1.4.12
== 1.4.9
== 1.3.10
== 1.1.2
== 1.4.7
== 1.4.6
== 1.2.7
== 1.4.15
== 1.3.7
== 1.4.13
== 1.3.2
== 1.4.0
Low March 27, 2008 3/27/08
<= 1.4.19
>= 1.5 < 1.5.0
Medium March 10, 2008 3/10/08
<= 1.4.18
Medium March 4, 2008 3/4/08
== 1.4.18
Medium February 26, 2008 2/26/08
== 1.4.18
== 1.4.8
== 1.4.17
== 1.4.11
== 1.4.14
== 1.4.10
== 1.4.16
== 1.4.12
== 1.4.9
== 1.4.7
== 1.4.15
== 1.4.13
Medium September 12, 2007 9/12/07
<= 1.4.15
Medium July 24, 2007 7/24/07
<= 1.4.15
Medium July 24, 2007 7/24/07
<= 1.4.15
Low July 24, 2007 7/24/07
<= 1.4.15
High July 24, 2007 7/24/07
<= 1.4.15
Low July 24, 2007 7/24/07
<= 1.4.15
Medium April 18, 2007 4/18/07
== 1.4.12
== 1.4.13
High April 18, 2007 4/18/07
== 1.4.3
== 1.3.6
== 1.3.12
== 1.3.15
== 1.4.1
== 1.3.0
== 1.4.8
== 1.4.4
== 1.3.9
== 1.3.5
== 1.3.13
== 1.3.4
== 1.4.2
== 1.3.14
== 1.4.10
== 1.4.5
== 1.3.3
== 1.3.8
== 1.3.11
== 1.3.16
== 1.3.1
== 1.4.12
== 1.4.9
== 1.3.10
== 1.4.7
== 1.4.6
== 1.3.7
== 1.4.13
== 1.3.2
== 1.4.0
Medium March 6, 2006 3/6/06
== 1.4.3
== 1.2.3
== 1.2.5
== 1.3.6
== 1.3.12
== 1.3.15
== 1.4.1
== 1.2.2
== 1.3.0
== 1.0.3
== 1.4.8
== 1.1.6
== 1.4.4
== 1.1.5
== 1.3.9
== 1.2.4
== 1.3.5
== 1.1.1
== 1.2.8
== 1.3.13
== 1.2.6
== 1.3.4
== 1.4.2
== 1.2.1
== 1.3.14
== 1.1.4
== 1.1.9
== 1.4.10
== 1.1.3
== 1.4.5
== 1.1.0
== 1.3.3
== 1.3.8
== 1.0.2
== 1.1.7
== 1.2.0
== 1.1.8
== 1.3.11
== 1.3.16
== 1.3.1
== 1.4.9
== 1.3.10
== 1.1.2
== 1.4.7
== 1.4.6
== 1.2.7
== 1.3.7
== 1.3.2
== 1.4.0
Low February 18, 2006 2/18/06
== 1.4.3
== 1.2.3
== 1.2.5
== 1.3.6
== 1.3.12
== 1.3.15
== 1.4.1
== 1.2.2
== 1.3.0
== 1.0.3
== 1.4.8
== 1.1.6
== 1.4.4
== 1.1.5
== 1.3.9
== 1.2.4
== 1.3.5
== 1.1.1
== 1.2.8
== 1.3.13
== 1.2.6
== 1.3.4
== 1.4.2
== 1.2.1
== 1.3.14
== 1.1.4
== 1.1.9
== 1.1.3
== 1.4.5
== 1.1.0
== 1.3.3
== 1.3.8
== 1.0.2
== 1.1.7
== 1.2.0
== 1.1.8
== 1.3.11
== 1.3.16
== 1.3.1
== 1.3.10
== 1.1.2
== 1.4.7
== 1.4.6
== 1.2.7
== 1.3.7
== 1.3.2
== 1.4.0
Medium February 16, 2005 2/16/05
== 1.3.7

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.