Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "mambo"

Found 3 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/mambo/1.2.3

mambo / mambo

26 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High November 25, 2008 11/25/08
*
Low August 19, 2008 8/19/08
== 4.6.2
== 4.6.5
Medium June 30, 2008 6/30/08
== 4.5_1.0.1
== 4.5.2
== 4.5_1.0.3_beta
== 4.5.0.2
== 4.6
== 4.5.2.2
== 4.5.1_1.0.9
== 4.6.1
== 4.6.2
== 4.5.2.3
== 4.5
== 4.5.1_beta2
== 4.5_1.0.0
== 4.6.4
== 4.5.1a
== 4.5.1_beta
== 4.5.3h
== 4.5.2.1
== 4.0.14
== 4.5.1.3
== 4.5_1.0.2
== 4.5.4
== 4.5_1.0.9
High February 19, 2008 2/19/08
*
High February 15, 2008 2/15/08
== 4.5
High February 4, 2008 2/4/08
*
High January 31, 2008 1/31/08
== 4.5
High January 31, 2008 1/31/08
== 4.5_1.0.1
== 4.5.2
== 4.5_1.0.3_beta
== 4.5.0.2
== 4.5.2.2
== 4.5.1_1.0.9
== 4.5.2.3
== 4.5
== 4.5.1_beta2
== 4.5_1.0.0
== 4.5.1a
== 4.5.1_beta
== 4.5.3h
== 4.5.2.1
== 4.5.1.3
== 4.5_1.0.2
== 4.5.4
== 4.5_1.0.9
Low December 20, 2007 12/20/07
== 4.6.2
Medium October 11, 2007 10/11/07
*
High October 3, 2007 10/3/07
*
High August 21, 2007 8/21/07
*
Low May 9, 2007 5/9/07
== 4.6.1
Low March 7, 2007 3/7/07
== 4.6-rc1
== 4.6.1
== 4.6-rc2
Medium February 6, 2007 2/6/07
<= 4.5.4
High January 19, 2007 1/19/07
== 4.6.1
High August 22, 2006 8/22/06
== 4.6-rc1
== 4.5_1.0.1
== 4.5.2
== 4.5_1.0.3_beta
== 4.5.0.2
== 4.5.2.2
== 4.5.1_1.0.9
== 4.5.2.3
== 4.5.3h-h
== 4.5_1.0.3_beta-beta
== 4.5.1a-beta
== 4.5_1.0.0
== 4.5.1a
== 4.5.3h
== 4.5.1a-a
== 4.5.1a-beta_2
== 4.5.2.1
== 4.0.14
== 4.5.1.3
== 4.5_1.0.2
== 4.5_1.0.9
High June 27, 2006 6/27/06
<= 4.6
High June 27, 2006 6/27/06
<= 4.6
Medium April 21, 2006 4/21/06
== 4.5.3h-h
High April 17, 2006 4/17/06
== 4.5_1.0.1
== 4.5.2
== 4.5_1.0.3_beta
== 4.5.2.2
== 4.5.1_1.0.9
== 4.5.2.3
== 4.5_1.0.3_beta-beta
== 4.5.1a-beta
== 4.5_1.0.0
== 4.5.1a
== 4.5.3h
== 4.5.1a-beta_2
== 4.5.2.1
== 4.0.14
<= 4.5.3h
== 4.5_1.0.2
Medium February 24, 2006 2/24/06
== 4.5.3h-h
== 4.5.3h
Medium November 16, 2005 11/16/05
== 4.5.2
== 4.5.2.2
== 4.5.2.3
== 4.5.2.1
High June 15, 2005 6/15/05
== 4.5.2
== 4.5.0.2
== 4.5.2.2
== 4.5.1a-a
== 4.5.1.3
== 4.5_1.0.9
High February 21, 2005 2/21/05
<= 4.5.2
High September 18, 2004 9/18/04
== 4.5_1.0.9

mambo-foundation / mambo

8 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High December 8, 2011 12/8/11
== 4.6
== 4.6.2-pre2
== 4.6.2
== 4.6-rc1
== 4.6.2-pre1
== 4.6.1
== 4.6.4
<= 4.6.5
== 4.6-rc2
== 4.6.3
Medium September 23, 2011 9/23/11
== 4.6.5
Medium September 11, 2009 9/11/09
<= 4.6.3
== 4.6.2
Low September 11, 2009 9/11/09
<= 4.6.3
== 4.6.2
Medium September 11, 2009 9/11/09
<= 4.6.3
== 4.6.2
Medium September 11, 2009 9/11/09
<= 4.6.3
== 4.6.2
Medium May 28, 2008 5/28/08
<= 4.6.4
High May 28, 2008 5/28/08
<= 4.6.4

mamboserver / mambo

2 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High February 4, 2008 2/4/08
== 1.0
High August 23, 2007 8/23/07
*

Showing vulnerabilities for 3 products matching "mambo". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.