How should we interpret CVSS severity scores?

CVSS estimates technical severity, but it does not automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, asset criticality, known exploitation, and whether compensating controls exist. A Medium CVSS on an exposed production system can be more urgent than a Critical on an isolated non-production host.

Vulnerability Database

Q: What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

Q: What's the difference between a vulnerability, an exploit, and a zero-day?

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. Risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Q: Why do vulnerabilities keep reappearing in our environment?

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete asset discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host.

Q: How do we prioritize remediation without burning out the team?

Use a repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress so remediation is steady, not reactive.

Q: How can SynScan help reduce vulnerability risk over time?

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.

325,773

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "mdaemon"

Found 4 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/mdaemon/1.2.3

deerfield / mdaemon

2 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Exploit	Date	Affected Version
CVE-1999-0846	Medium		December 1, 1999 12/1/99	== 2.8.6 == 2.8.5
CVE-1999-0844	Medium		November 24, 1999 11/24/99	== 2.8.6 == 2.8.5

alt-n / mdaemon

28 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Date	Affected Version
CVE-2008-6967	Medium	August 13, 2009 8/13/09	== 6.8.3 == 3.5.4 == 7.2 == 9.51 <= 10.0.1 == 9.64 == 3.5.0 == 9.6.4 == 3.1_beta == 9.0.4 == 3.5.1 == 6.0.6 == 5.0 == 8.1.3 == 9.50 == 3.1.2 == 2.8 == 5.0.5 == 6.8.4 == 6.0 == 9.60 == 9.0.2 == 8.1.1 == 5.0.6 == 5.0.3 == 2.71_sp1 == 6.5.0 == 9.0.1 == 5.0.2 == 8.1.4 == 9.0.5 == 9.6.5 == 3.1.1 == 2.8.5.0 == 5.0.4 == 3.5.6 == 3.0.4 == 6.8.5 == 9.0.6 == 9.0.3 == 5.0.7 == 6.0.7 == 5.0.1 == 3.0.3 == 6.0.5 == 9.53
CVE-2007-3622	Low	July 9, 2007 7/9/07	<= 9.60
CVE-2006-5968	Low	November 17, 2006 11/17/06	== 9.51 == 9.0.5 == 9.0.6 == 9.53
CVE-2006-5708	High	November 4, 2006 11/4/06	== 6.8.3 == 3.5.4 == 7.2 == 6.7.9 == 6.8.1 == 3.5.0 == 3.1_beta == 9.0.4 == 3.5.1 == 6.0.6 == 5.0 == 8.1.3 == 3.1.2 == 2.8 == 5.0.5 == 6.8.4 == 6.0 == 9.0.2 == 8.1.1 == 5.0.6 == 5.0.3 == 2.71_sp1 == 6.5.0 == 9.0.1 == 6.5.1 == 5.0.2 == 8.1.4 == 9.0.5 == 6.8.0 == 6.5.2 == 3.1.1 == 2.8.5.0 == 5.0.4 == 3.5.6 == 3.0.4 == 6.8.5 == 6.8.2 == 9.0.3 == 5.0.7 == 6.0.7 == 6.7.5 == 5.0.1 <= 9.50 == 3.0.3 == 6.0.5
CVE-2006-5709	High	November 4, 2006 11/4/06	*
CVE-2006-4364	Medium	August 27, 2006 8/27/06	== 6.8.3 == 3.5.4 == 7.2 == 6.7.9 == 6.8.1 == 3.5.0 == 3.1_beta == 9.0.4 == 3.5.1 == 6.0.6 == 5.0 == 8.1.3 == 3.1.2 == 2.8 == 5.0.5 == 6.8.4 == 6.0 == 9.0.2 == 8.1.1 == 5.0.6 == 5.0.3 == 2.71_sp1 == 6.5.0 == 9.0.1 == 6.5.1 == 5.0.2 == 8.1.4 == 9.0.5 == 6.8.0 == 6.5.2 == 3.1.1 == 2.8.5.0 == 5.0.4 == 3.5.6 == 3.0.4 == 6.8.5 == 6.8.2 == 9.0.3 == 5.0.7 == 6.0.7 == 6.7.5 == 5.0.1 == 3.0.3 == 6.0.5
CVE-2006-2646	High	May 30, 2006 5/30/06	== 6.8.3 == 3.5.4 == 7.2 == 6.7.9 == 6.8.1 == 3.5.0 == 3.1_beta == 3.5.1 == 6.0.6 == 5.0 == 8.1.3 == 3.1.2 == 2.8 == 5.0.5 == 6.8.4 == 6.0 == 8.1.1 == 5.0.6 == 5.0.3 == 6.5.0 == 9.0.1 == 6.5.1 == 5.0.2 == 8.1.4 == 6.8.0 == 6.5.2 == 3.1.1 == 2.8.5.0 == 5.0.4 == 3.5.6 == 3.0.4 == 6.8.5 == 6.8.2 == 5.0.7 == 6.0.7 == 6.7.5 == 5.0.1 == 3.0.3 == 6.0.5
CVE-2006-0925	Medium	February 28, 2006 2/28/06	== 8.1.1 == 8.1.4
CVE-2005-4266	High	December 15, 2005 12/15/05	== 8.1.3
CVE-2005-4209	Low	December 13, 2005 12/13/05	== 8.1.3
CVE-2004-1546	Medium	December 31, 2004 12/31/04	== 6.5.1
CVE-2004-2292	Medium	December 31, 2004 12/31/04	== 6.8.3 == 3.5.4 == 6.7.9 == 6.8.1 == 3.5.0 == 3.1_beta == 3.5.1 == 6.0.6 == 3.1.2 == 2.8 == 6.8.4 == 6.0 == 2.71_sp1 == 6.5.0 == 6.8.0 == 6.5.2 == 3.1.1 == 2.8.5.0 == 3.5.6 == 3.0.4 == 6.8.5 == 6.8.2 == 5.0.7 == 6.0.7 == 6.7.5 == 3.0.3 == 6.0.5
CVE-2004-2504	High	December 31, 2004 12/31/04	== 6.8.3 == 7.2 == 6.8.1 == 6.8.4 == 6.8.0 == 6.8.5 == 6.8.2
CVE-2003-1470	High	December 31, 2003 12/31/03	== 6.7.5
CVE-2003-1471	Medium	December 31, 2003 12/31/03	<= 6.0.7
CVE-2003-1200	High	December 29, 2003 12/29/03	== 6.8.3 == 6.7.9 == 6.8.1 == 6.8.4 == 6.8.0 == 6.5.2 == 6.8.5 == 6.8.2 == 6.7.5
CVE-2002-1539	Medium	March 31, 2003 3/31/03	== 6.0.6 == 6.0 == 6.0.7 == 6.0.5
CVE-2002-1738	Medium	December 31, 2002 12/31/02	== 5.0 == 5.0.5 == 5.0.3 == 5.0.2 == 5.0.4 == 5.0.1
CVE-2002-1740	Low	December 31, 2002 12/31/02	== 5.0 == 5.0.5 == 5.0.3 == 5.0.2 == 5.0.4 == 5.0.1
CVE-2001-0583	Medium	August 22, 2001 8/22/01	== 3.5.4
CVE-2001-0584	Low	August 22, 2001 8/22/01	== 3.5.6
CVE-2001-0064	Medium	February 12, 2001 2/12/01	== 3.5.0
CVE-2001-0104	High	February 12, 2001 2/12/01	== 3.5.1
CVE-2000-1020	High	December 11, 2000 12/11/00	== 3.1.1
CVE-2000-1021	High	December 11, 2000 12/11/00	== 3.1.1
CVE-2000-0716	Low	October 20, 2000 10/20/00	== 2.8
CVE-2000-0501	Low	June 16, 2000 6/16/00	== 2.8.5.0
CVE-2000-0399	Medium	May 24, 2000 5/24/00	== 3.1_beta == 3.0.3

altn / mdaemon

11 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Date	Affected Version
CVE-2022-29975	Medium	May 11, 2022 5/11/22	< 22.0.0
CVE-2022-29976	Medium	May 11, 2022 5/11/22	< 22.0.0
CVE-2021-27180	Medium	April 14, 2021 4/14/21	< 20.0.4
CVE-2021-27181	High	April 14, 2021 4/14/21	< 20.0.4
CVE-2021-27182	High	April 14, 2021 4/14/21	< 20.0.4
CVE-2021-27183	High	April 14, 2021 4/14/21	< 20.0.4
CVE-2019-8983	Low	February 21, 2019 2/21/19	>= 14.0 < 18.5.2
CVE-2019-8984	Low	February 21, 2019 2/21/19	>= 14.0 < 18.5.2
CVE-2012-2584	Low	August 12, 2012 8/12/12	== 12.5.4
CVE-2008-2631	Medium	June 10, 2008 6/10/08	<= 9.6.5
CVE-2008-1358	Medium	March 17, 2008 3/17/08	== 9.6.4

mdaemon / mdaemon

2 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Exploit	Date	Affected Version
CVE-2024-11182	Medium		November 15, 2024 11/15/24	< 24.5.1
CVE-2002-1739	Medium		December 31, 2002 12/31/02	>= 5.0 <= 5.0.6

Showing vulnerabilities for 4 products matching "mdaemon". Each product has independent pagination.

Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity

SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.

No setup fees
5-min deployment
Cancel anytime

Book a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.