How should we interpret CVSS severity scores?

CVSS estimates technical severity, but it does not automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, asset criticality, known exploitation, and whether compensating controls exist. A Medium CVSS on an exposed production system can be more urgent than a Critical on an isolated non-production host.

Vulnerability Database

Q: What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

Q: What's the difference between a vulnerability, an exploit, and a zero-day?

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. Risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Q: Why do vulnerabilities keep reappearing in our environment?

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete asset discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host.

Q: How do we prioritize remediation without burning out the team?

Use a repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress so remediation is steady, not reactive.

Q: How can SynScan help reduce vulnerability risk over time?

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.

325,773

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "messenger"

Found 7 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/messenger/1.2.3

yahoo / messenger

33 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Date	Affected Version
CVE-2014-7216	High	September 11, 2015 9/11/15	<= 11.5.0.228
CVE-2012-0268	Medium	January 19, 2012 1/19/12	== 9.0.0.2123 == 10.0.0.525-beta == 8.1.0.419 == 5.6 == 8.1.0.244 == 1.0 == 8.1.0.416 == 9.0.0.2162 == 5.6.0.1355 == 7.5.0.814 == 6.1 == 8.1.0.249 == 8.1.0.239 == 7.0.0.437 == 8.0.1 == 8.0.0.701 == 5.6.0.1358 == 8.1.0.413 == 8.0 == 9.0.0.2160 == 6.0.0.1750 == 1.0.4 == 10.0.0.1270 == 7.0 == 10.0.0.1264 == 5.6.0.1347 == 9.0.0.2128 == 7.5 == 8.1.0.195 == 8.0.0.505 == 8.0.0.508 == 10.0.0.1258 == 2.0.1.4 == 9.0.0.797-beta == 9.0.0.907-beta == 3.5 == 10.0.0.1267 <= 11.5.0.152 == 5.0.1232 == 9.0.0.2112 == 11.0.0.1751 == 5.5.1249 == 0.99.17-1 == 11.0.0.2009 == 3.0.1 == 8.1 == 5.5 == 6.0.0.1921 == 10.0.0.1102 == 6.0.0.1643 == 8.1.0.402 == 7.0.438 == 3.0 == 5.0 == 5.6.0.1351 == 9.0.0.2152 == 8.0_2005.1.1.4 == 9.0.0.2018 == 11.0.0.2014 == 10.0.0.1241 == 8.1.0.421 == 10.0.0.542-beta == 9.0.0.2133 == 4.0 == 5.0.1065 == 4.1 == 8.1.0.209 == 9.0.0.2161 == 9.0.0.2034 == 1.0.6 == 8.0.0.716 == 5.6.0.1356 == 6.0 == 9.0.0.922-beta == 7.0.0.426 == 5.0.1046 == 3.0.1-beta-35554 == 9.0.0.2136 == 8.1.0.401 == 9.0.0.1912 == 10.0.0.331-pre-alpha == 8.0.0.863 == 9.0.0.1389-beta
CVE-2009-4171	Low	December 2, 2009 12/2/09	== 9.0.0.2162
CVE-2007-5017	Medium	September 20, 2007 9/20/07	== 8.1.0.421
CVE-2007-4635	Medium	August 31, 2007 8/31/07	== 8.1.0.402 == 8.1.0.209
CVE-2007-4515	High	August 31, 2007 8/31/07	<= 8.1.0.413
CVE-2007-4391	High	August 17, 2007 8/17/07	== 8.1.0.413
CVE-2007-3928	High	July 21, 2007 7/21/07	== 8.1
CVE-2007-3638	Medium	July 10, 2007 7/10/07	== 8.1
CVE-2007-3147	High	June 11, 2007 6/11/07	== 8.1.0.249 == 8.0.1 == 8.0 == 2.0.1.4 == 8.0_2005.1.1.4 == 8.0.0.863
CVE-2007-3148	High	June 11, 2007 6/11/07	== 8.1.0.249 == 8.0.1 == 8.0 == 2.0.1.4 == 8.0_2005.1.1.4 == 8.0.0.863
CVE-2007-1680	High	April 6, 2007 4/6/07	== 8.1.0.239 == 8.0 == 8.0_2005.1.1.4 == 8.1.0.209 == 8.0.0.863
CVE-2007-0868	Medium	February 9, 2007 2/9/07	== 5.6 == 5.6.0.1355 == 7.5.0.814 == 8.1.0.239 == 5.6.0.1358 == 8.0 == 6.0.0.1750 == 5.6.0.1347 == 5.0.1232 == 5.5.1249 == 5.5 == 6.0.0.1921 == 6.0.0.1643 == 7.0.438 == 5.0 == 5.6.0.1351 == 8.0_2005.1.1.4 == 4.0 == 5.0.1065 == 8.1.0.209 == 5.6.0.1356 == 6.0 == 5.0.1046 == 8.0.0.863
CVE-2007-0768	Low	February 6, 2007 2/6/07	<= 8.1.0.209
CVE-2006-6603	High	December 15, 2006 12/15/06	== 5.6 == 7.0 == 7.5 == 5.5 <= 8.0 == 5.0 == 6.0
CVE-2006-5563	Medium	October 27, 2006 10/27/06	== 8.0
CVE-2006-4975	Low	September 25, 2006 9/25/06	*
CVE-2006-3298	Medium	June 29, 2006 6/29/06	== 7.5.0.814 == 7.0.438
CVE-2005-1671	Low	May 19, 2005 5/19/05	== 5.6 == 5.5 == 5.6.0.1351 == 6.0
CVE-2005-1618	Medium	May 16, 2005 5/16/05	== 5.6 == 5.5 == 6.0
CVE-2005-0737	High	May 2, 2005 5/2/05	== 5.6 == 5.6.0.1355 == 5.6.0.1358 == 6.0.0.1750 == 5.6.0.1347 == 5.0.1232 == 5.5.1249 == 5.5 == 6.0.0.1921 == 6.0.0.1643 == 5.0 == 5.6.0.1351 == 4.0 == 5.0.1065 == 5.6.0.1356 == 6.0 == 5.0.1046
CVE-2005-0242	Low	February 18, 2005 2/18/05	== 5.6 == 6.0.0.1750 == 5.5 == 5.6.0.1351 == 6.0
CVE-2005-0243	Medium	February 17, 2005 2/17/05	== 5.6 == 6.0.0.1750 == 5.5 == 5.6.0.1351 == 6.0
CVE-2004-0043	High	February 3, 2004 2/3/04	<= 5.6.0.1351
CVE-2003-1135	Low	December 31, 2003 12/31/03	== 5.6
CVE-2002-1664	Medium	December 31, 2002 12/31/02	== 5.0
CVE-2002-1665	High	December 31, 2002 12/31/02	== 5.0
CVE-2002-2361	Medium	December 31, 2002 12/31/02	== 5.5 == 5.0 == 4.0
CVE-2002-0031	Low	July 26, 2002 7/26/02	== 5.0
CVE-2002-0032	High	July 26, 2002 7/26/02	== 5.0
CVE-2002-0320	High	June 25, 2002 6/25/02	== 5.0
CVE-2002-0321	Medium	June 25, 2002 6/25/02	== 5.0
CVE-2002-0322	High	June 25, 2002 6/25/02	== 4.0

novell / messenger

2 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Exploit	Date	Affected Version
CVE-2013-1085	High		March 29, 2013 3/29/13	<= 2.1 == 2.2.0 <= 2.2.1
CVE-2011-3179	Medium		December 8, 2011 12/8/11	== 2.2.0 == 2.1

telegram / messenger

1 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Exploit	Date	Affected Version
CVE-2014-8688	High		March 14, 2017 3/14/17	== 2.6 == 1.8.2

mibew / messenger

1 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Exploit	Date	Affected Version
CVE-2020-17476	Medium		August 10, 2020 8/10/20	< 3.2.7

facebook / messenger

1 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Exploit	Date	Affected Version
CVE-2020-20093	Medium		March 23, 2022 3/23/22	<= 227.0 <= 228.1.0.10.116

Showing vulnerabilities for 7 products matching "messenger". Each product has independent pagination.

Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity

SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.

No setup fees
5-min deployment
Cancel anytime

Book a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.