Vulnerability Database

325,773

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "netbsd"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/netbsd/1.2.3

netbsd / netbsd

33 vulnerabilities found (with exploits)
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High July 1, 2024 7/1/24
<= 10.0.0
High June 19, 2017 6/19/17
<= 7.1
High January 20, 2017 1/20/17
== 6.1.1
== 6.1.3
== 6.0
== 6.1.4
== 6.0.4
== 6.0.6
== 7.0
== 6.0.2
== 6.0.5
== 6.1.2
== 6.0.1
== 6.1.5
== 6.0.3
== 6.1
Low May 24, 2011 5/24/11
== 5.1
Low May 23, 2011 5/23/11
*
<= 1.6.1
== 1.0
== 1.1
== 1.2
== 1.2.1
== 1.3
== 1.3.1
== 1.3.2
== 1.3.3
== 1.4
== 1.4.1
== 1.4.2
== 1.4.3
== 1.5
== 1.5.1
== 1.5.2
== 1.5.3
== 1.6
Low May 16, 2011 5/16/11
== 5.1
Low March 2, 2011 3/2/11
== 5.0.2
Low March 2, 2011 3/2/11
== 5.0.2
Medium July 1, 2009 7/1/09
== 5.0
High September 25, 2008 9/25/08
== 4.0
High September 11, 2008 9/11/08
== 4.0
High March 27, 2008 3/27/08
== 4.0
Low March 9, 2008 3/9/08
*
Low October 10, 2006 10/10/06
== 3.0
Low December 31, 2005 12/31/05
== 1.6
== 2.1
== current
== 2.0.2
== 1.6.1
== 2.0.3
== 1.6.2
== 1.6-beta
== 2.0.1
== 2.0
High December 31, 2004 12/31/04
== 2.0
Medium August 18, 2004 8/18/04
== 1.5.3
== 1.6
== 1.5
== 1.6.1
== 1.6.2
== 1.5.1
== 1.5.2
== 2.0
Critical August 27, 2003 8/27/03
>= 1.5 <= 1.6.1
Low March 18, 2003 3/18/03
== 1.5.3
== 1.6
== 1.5
== 1.5.1
== 1.5.2
High March 7, 2003 3/7/03
== 1.5.3
== 1.6
== 1.5
== 1.5.1
== 1.5.2
Low October 11, 2002 10/11/02
== 1.5.3
== 1.6
== 1.5
== 1.5.1
== 1.5.2
Medium June 25, 2002 6/25/02
== 2.0.4
High February 27, 2002 2/27/02
== 1.5.2
Medium September 20, 2001 9/20/01
<= 1.5
High August 14, 2001 8/14/01
== 1.0
== 1.1
== 1.2
== 1.2.1
== 1.3
== 1.3.1
== 1.3.2
== 1.3.3
== 1.4
== 1.4.1
== 1.4.2
== 1.4.3
== 1.5
== 1.5.1
Medium July 7, 2001 7/7/01
== 1.5
== 1.5.1
High June 18, 2001 6/18/01
== 1.3
== 1.5
== 1.2.1
== 1.3.1
== 1.4.2
== 1.3.3
== 1.4.3
== 1.4
== 1.3.2
== 1.4.1
High February 16, 2001 2/16/01
== 1.5
High February 12, 2001 2/12/01
== 1.5
== 1.4.2
== 1.4
== 1.4.1
High December 19, 2000 12/19/00
== 1.4.2
== 1.4
== 1.4.1
High August 9, 1999 8/9/99
== 1.3
== 1.2.1
== 1.3.1
== 1.3.3
== 1.0
== 1.1
== 1.4
== 1.3.2
== 1.2
Medium July 15, 1999 7/15/99
== 1.4
== 1.3.1
== 1.3.3
== 1.3.2
Low July 3, 1998 7/3/98
== 1.3
== 1.2.1
== 1.3.1
<= 1.3.2
== 1.0
== 1.1
== 1.2

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.