Vulnerability Database

346,508

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "openbsd"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/openbsd/1.2.3

openbsd / openbsd

721 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium July 7, 2001 7/7/01
== 2.8
== 2.9
Low June 27, 2001 6/27/01
<= 2.8
High June 18, 2001 6/18/01
== 2.8
== 2.7
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.5
== 2.3
High June 18, 2001 6/18/01
== 2.8
Low June 2, 2001 6/2/01
== 2.8
== 2.9
== 2.7
== 2.6
High May 3, 2001 5/3/01
<= 2.8
High May 3, 2001 5/3/01
<= 2.8
Low March 12, 2001 3/12/01
== 2.4
Medium March 12, 2001 3/12/01
== 2.4
High March 12, 2001 3/12/01
== 2.5
Low March 12, 2001 3/12/01
== 2.6
High February 12, 2001 2/12/01
== 2.8
== 2.7
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.5
Medium December 19, 2000 12/19/00
== 2.1
== 2.2
== 2.0
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.5
== 2.3
Medium December 19, 2000 12/19/00
== 2.7
High December 19, 2000 12/19/00
== 2.7
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.5
== 2.3
High December 19, 2000 12/19/00
== 2.7
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.5
== 2.3
High December 19, 2000 12/19/00
*
High December 19, 2000 12/19/00
*
High December 19, 2000 12/19/00
== 2.7
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.5
== 2.3
Low December 11, 2000 12/11/00
== 2.7
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.5
== 2.3
High December 11, 2000 12/11/00
== 2.7
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.5
== 2.3
High October 20, 2000 10/20/00
== 2.7
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.5
High October 20, 2000 10/20/00
== 2.7
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.5
Medium January 19, 2000 1/19/00
== 2.6
Medium December 30, 1999 12/30/99
== 2.4
== 2.3
Low September 5, 1999 9/5/99
== 2.7
== 2.6
== 2.5
Low August 12, 1999 8/12/99
== 2.5
High August 9, 1999 8/9/99
== 2.1
== 2.2
== 2.0
== 2.4
== 2.5
== 2.3
Medium August 6, 1999 8/6/99
== 2.5
Low August 3, 1999 8/3/99
== 2.5
Medium March 22, 1999 3/22/99
== 2.4
Medium March 21, 1999 3/21/99
*
Low February 25, 1999 2/25/99
*
Low February 23, 1999 2/23/99
*
Low February 19, 1999 2/19/99
== 2.4
Low February 17, 1999 2/17/99
== 2.4
High December 4, 1998 12/4/98
== 2.4
== 2.3
High November 4, 1998 11/4/98
== 2.2
== 2.4
== 2.3
High August 3, 1998 8/3/98
== 2.3
Low May 21, 1998 5/21/98
== 2.1
== 2.2
High February 20, 1998 2/20/98
== 2.2
High February 1, 1998 2/1/98
== 2.2
Medium February 1, 1998 2/1/98
== 2.1
== 2.2
== 2.0
Medium October 2, 1997 10/2/97
== 2.1
Low September 15, 1997 9/15/97
== 2.1
Medium August 24, 1997 8/24/97
*

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.