Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "outlook"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/outlook/1.2.3

microsoft / outlook

115 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High February 10, 2026 2/10/26
== 2016
High July 8, 2025 7/8/25
== 2016
Medium June 10, 2025 6/10/25
== 2016
High April 8, 2025 4/8/25
< 4.2509.0
Medium February 11, 2025 2/11/25
< 4.2501.1
Medium January 14, 2025 1/14/25
== 2016
High January 14, 2025 1/14/25
< 16.93
High December 18, 2024 12/18/24
== 16.83.3
Medium October 8, 2024 10/8/24
== 2016
Medium September 10, 2024 9/10/24
< 4.2435.0
Medium August 13, 2024 8/13/24
== 2016
Medium July 9, 2024 7/9/24
== 2016
High June 11, 2024 6/11/24
== 2016
High April 9, 2024 4/9/24
< 1.2023.0322.0100
High March 12, 2024 3/12/24
< 4.2404.0
High February 13, 2024 2/13/24
== 2016
High September 12, 2023 9/12/23
== 2016
Medium August 8, 2023 8/8/23
== 2016
== 2013-sp1
High July 11, 2023 7/11/23
== 2016
== 2013-sp1
== 2013
High June 14, 2023 6/14/23
== 2013-sp1
== 2016
High June 1, 2023 6/1/23
== 2016
== 2013-sp1
Critical March 14, 2023 3/14/23
== 2016
== 2013-sp1
High June 8, 2021 6/8/21
== 2013-sp1
High June 8, 2021 6/8/21
== 2016
== 2013-sp1
High April 13, 2021 4/13/21
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
Medium December 10, 2020 12/10/20
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High October 16, 2020 10/16/20
== 2016
Low October 16, 2020 10/16/20
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
Medium August 17, 2020 8/17/20
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
Medium August 17, 2020 8/17/20
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High July 14, 2020 7/14/20
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High April 15, 2020 4/15/20
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
Medium February 11, 2020 2/11/20
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
Low August 14, 2019 8/14/19
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High August 14, 2019 8/14/19
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
Low July 29, 2019 7/29/19
*
Low July 15, 2019 7/15/19
== 2016
== 2013-sp1
Low January 8, 2019 1/8/19
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
Low January 8, 2019 1/8/19
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High November 14, 2018 11/14/18
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High November 14, 2018 11/14/18
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High November 14, 2018 11/14/18
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High November 14, 2018 11/14/18
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
Low June 14, 2018 6/14/18
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
Low May 16, 2018 5/16/18
== 2007
Low May 16, 2018 5/16/18
== 2016
== 2007
== 2013
== 2010
Low February 15, 2018 2/15/18
== 2016
== 2007
== 2013
== 2010
High February 15, 2018 2/15/18
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High February 15, 2018 2/15/18
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High January 10, 2018 1/10/18
== 2007-sp3
== 2016
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.