Vulnerability Database

351,760

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "safari"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/safari/1.2.3

apple / safari

17439 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low September 27, 2007 9/27/07
<= 3.0.3
Medium September 27, 2007 9/27/07
<= 3.0.3
Low September 27, 2007 9/27/07
<= 3.0.3
Medium September 11, 2007 9/11/07
== 3.0.3
Medium August 20, 2007 8/20/07
<= 3.0.3
Low August 18, 2007 8/18/07
<= 3.0.3
Medium August 3, 2007 8/3/07
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.2
Low August 3, 2007 8/3/07
<= 3.0.2
Medium August 3, 2007 8/3/07
<= 3.0.2
High July 23, 2007 7/23/07
== 3.0
High July 12, 2007 7/12/07
== 3.0
High July 3, 2007 7/3/07
== 3.0.2
High June 25, 2007 6/25/07
== 3.0.2
Low June 25, 2007 6/25/07
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
High June 21, 2007 6/21/07
== 3.0.1
High June 19, 2007 6/19/07
== 3.0.1
Low June 19, 2007 6/19/07
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
Low June 14, 2007 6/14/07
== 3.0.1
High June 12, 2007 6/12/07
== 3.0.1
High June 12, 2007 6/12/07
== 2.0.1
== 3.0.1
== 2.0.3
== 2.0.2
== 2.0
== 2.0.4
*
== 3.0
High June 12, 2007 6/12/07
== 3.0
High May 24, 2007 5/24/07
== 2.0.4
Low May 9, 2007 5/9/07
*
High April 24, 2007 4/24/07
*
Medium April 22, 2007 4/22/07
*
High February 1, 2007 2/1/07
== 2.0.4_419.3
High January 18, 2007 1/18/07
== 2.0.4_419.3
Medium December 3, 2006 12/3/06
== 2.0.4
High July 31, 2006 7/31/06
== 2.0.4
Medium July 6, 2006 7/6/06
== 2.0.4_419.3
Medium June 26, 2006 6/26/06
== 2.0.3_417.9.3
Medium April 25, 2006 4/25/06
== 2.0.3
== 1.3.1
Medium April 21, 2006 4/21/06
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.3
== 2.0.2
== 2.0
High April 21, 2006 4/21/06
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.3
== 2.0.2
== 2.0
High April 21, 2006 4/21/06
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.3
== 2.0.2
== 2.0
Medium April 21, 2006 4/21/06
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.3
== 2.0.2
== 2.0
Medium March 31, 2006 3/31/06
== 1.2.2
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.2
== 1.0
== 1.3
== 2.0
== 1.2.1
== 1.1
== 1.2
== 2.0_pre
== beta2
== 1.2.3
Medium December 31, 2005 12/31/05
== 2.0.2
High December 22, 2005 12/22/05
== 1.2.2
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.2
== 1.0
== 1.3
== 2.0
== 1.2.1
== 1.1
== 1.2
== 1.2.3
High November 29, 2005 11/29/05
== 2.0.2
Medium October 26, 2005 10/26/05
== 2.0
Medium September 21, 2005 9/21/05
== 1.2.2
== 2.0.1
== 1.0
== 1.3
== 2.0
== 1.2.1
== 1.1
== 1.2
== 1.2.3
High August 19, 2005 8/19/05
*
Low August 19, 2005 8/19/05
*
Medium August 19, 2005 8/19/05
*
Medium August 17, 2005 8/17/05
== 1.3
Low July 13, 2005 7/13/05
== 2.0
Low May 3, 2005 5/3/05
== 1.3
Medium May 2, 2005 5/2/05
== 1.2.5
Low May 2, 2005 5/2/05
== 1.2.4

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.