Found 1 matching product.
You can search for specific versions with /product/safari/1.2.3
| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Low | September 27, 2007 9/27/07 |
<= 3.0.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | September 27, 2007 9/27/07 |
<= 3.0.3
|
|
|
|
Low | September 27, 2007 9/27/07 |
<= 3.0.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | September 11, 2007 9/11/07 |
== 3.0.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | August 20, 2007 8/20/07 |
<= 3.0.3
|
|
|
|
Low | August 18, 2007 8/18/07 |
<= 3.0.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | August 3, 2007 8/3/07 |
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.2
|
|
|
|
Low | August 3, 2007 8/3/07 |
<= 3.0.2
|
|
|
|
Medium | August 3, 2007 8/3/07 |
<= 3.0.2
|
|
|
|
High | July 23, 2007 7/23/07 |
== 3.0
|
|
|
|
High | July 12, 2007 7/12/07 |
== 3.0
|
|
|
|
High | July 3, 2007 7/3/07 |
== 3.0.2
|
|
|
|
High | June 25, 2007 6/25/07 |
== 3.0.2
|
|
|
|
Low | June 25, 2007 6/25/07 |
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
High | June 21, 2007 6/21/07 |
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
High | June 19, 2007 6/19/07 |
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Low | June 19, 2007 6/19/07 |
== 3.0
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
Low | June 14, 2007 6/14/07 |
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
High | June 12, 2007 6/12/07 |
== 3.0.1
|
|
|
|
High | June 12, 2007 6/12/07 |
== 2.0.1
== 3.0.1
== 2.0.3
== 2.0.2
== 2.0
== 2.0.4
*
== 3.0
|
|
|
|
High | June 12, 2007 6/12/07 |
== 3.0
|
|
|
|
High | May 24, 2007 5/24/07 |
== 2.0.4
|
|
|
|
Low | May 9, 2007 5/9/07 |
*
|
|
|
|
High | April 24, 2007 4/24/07 |
*
|
|
|
|
Medium | April 22, 2007 4/22/07 |
*
|
|
|
|
High | February 1, 2007 2/1/07 |
== 2.0.4_419.3
|
|
|
|
High | January 18, 2007 1/18/07 |
== 2.0.4_419.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 3, 2006 12/3/06 |
== 2.0.4
|
|
|
|
High | July 31, 2006 7/31/06 |
== 2.0.4
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 6, 2006 7/6/06 |
== 2.0.4_419.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | June 26, 2006 6/26/06 |
== 2.0.3_417.9.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | April 25, 2006 4/25/06 |
== 2.0.3
== 1.3.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | April 21, 2006 4/21/06 |
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.3
== 2.0.2
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | April 21, 2006 4/21/06 |
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.3
== 2.0.2
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
High | April 21, 2006 4/21/06 |
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.3
== 2.0.2
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | April 21, 2006 4/21/06 |
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.3
== 2.0.2
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | March 31, 2006 3/31/06 |
== 1.2.2
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.2
== 1.0
== 1.3
== 2.0
== 1.2.1
== 1.1
== 1.2
== 2.0_pre
== beta2
== 1.2.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 31, 2005 12/31/05 |
== 2.0.2
|
|
|
|
High | December 22, 2005 12/22/05 |
== 1.2.2
== 2.0.1
== 2.0.2
== 1.0
== 1.3
== 2.0
== 1.2.1
== 1.1
== 1.2
== 1.2.3
|
|
|
|
High | November 29, 2005 11/29/05 |
== 2.0.2
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 26, 2005 10/26/05 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | September 21, 2005 9/21/05 |
== 1.2.2
== 2.0.1
== 1.0
== 1.3
== 2.0
== 1.2.1
== 1.1
== 1.2
== 1.2.3
|
|
|
|
High | August 19, 2005 8/19/05 |
*
|
|
|
|
Low | August 19, 2005 8/19/05 |
*
|
|
|
|
Medium | August 19, 2005 8/19/05 |
*
|
|
|
|
Medium | August 17, 2005 8/17/05 |
== 1.3
|
|
|
|
Low | July 13, 2005 7/13/05 |
== 2.0
|
|
|
|
Low | May 3, 2005 5/3/05 |
== 1.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 2, 2005 5/2/05 |
== 1.2.5
|
|
|
|
Low | May 2, 2005 5/2/05 |
== 1.2.4
|
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.