How should we interpret CVSS severity scores?

CVSS estimates technical severity, but it does not automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, asset criticality, known exploitation, and whether compensating controls exist. A Medium CVSS on an exposed production system can be more urgent than a Critical on an isolated non-production host.

Vulnerability Database

Q: What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

Q: What's the difference between a vulnerability, an exploit, and a zero-day?

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. Risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Q: Why do vulnerabilities keep reappearing in our environment?

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete asset discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host.

Q: How do we prioritize remediation without burning out the team?

Use a repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress so remediation is steady, not reactive.

Q: How can SynScan help reduce vulnerability risk over time?

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.

326,214

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "serendipity"

Found 3 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/serendipity/1.2.3

s9y / serendipity

56 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Date	Affected Version
CVE-2023-53932	Medium	December 17, 2025 12/17/25	== 2.4.0
CVE-2023-53933	High	December 17, 2025 12/17/25	== 2.4.0
CVE-2024-58282	High	December 10, 2025 12/10/25	== 2.5.0
CVE-2023-31576	High	May 16, 2023 5/16/23	== 2.4.0-beta1
CVE-2020-10964	Critical	March 25, 2020 3/25/20	< 2.3.4
CVE-2011-4090	Medium	November 26, 2019 11/26/19	< 1.6
CVE-2011-1133	Medium	November 5, 2019 11/5/19	< 1.5.5
CVE-2011-1134	Critical	November 5, 2019 11/5/19	< 1.5.5
CVE-2011-1135	Medium	November 5, 2019 11/5/19	< 1.5.5
CVE-2016-10752	High	May 24, 2019 5/24/19	== 2.0.3
CVE-2019-11870	Low	May 9, 2019 5/9/19	< 2.1.5
CVE-2016-10737	Low	January 16, 2019 1/16/19	== 2.0.4
CVE-2017-1000129	Medium	November 17, 2017 11/17/17	== 2.0.3
CVE-2017-8101	Medium	April 24, 2017 4/24/17	== 2.0.5
CVE-2017-8102	Low	April 24, 2017 4/24/17	== 2.1-rc1
CVE-2017-5609	Medium	January 28, 2017 1/28/17	== 2.0.5
CVE-2017-5474	Medium	January 14, 2017 1/14/17	<= 2.0.5
CVE-2017-5475	Medium	January 14, 2017 1/14/17	<= 2.0.5
CVE-2017-5476	Medium	January 14, 2017 1/14/17	<= 2.0.5
CVE-2016-10082	High	December 30, 2016 12/30/16	<= 2.0.5
CVE-2016-9681	Low	December 25, 2016 12/25/16	<= 2.0.4
CVE-2016-9752	Medium	December 1, 2016 12/1/16	<= 2.0.4
CVE-2015-8603	Low	January 12, 2016 1/12/16	<= 2.0.2
CVE-2015-6969	Low	September 16, 2015 9/16/15	<= 2.0.1
CVE-2015-6968	Medium	September 16, 2015 9/16/15	<= 2.0.1
CVE-2015-6943	Medium	September 15, 2015 9/15/15	<= 2.0.1
CVE-2015-2289	Low	March 23, 2015 3/23/15	<= 2.0
CVE-2014-9432	Low	December 31, 2014 12/31/14	<= 2.0
CVE-2013-5670	Low	November 5, 2013 11/5/13	== 1.0.3 == 1.3 == 1.1.4 == 0.4 == 0.8.5 == 0.7 == 1.1.2 == 1.0.4 == 0.8.3 == 1.5.3 == 0.8.4 == 0.8.2 == 1.0.2 == 1.1.1 == 1.1 == 0.7.1 == 1.6.1 == 1.0.1 == 1.0 == 1.5.5 == 1.6 == 1.3.1 == 0.8.1 == 1.5.1 == 1.5.4 == 0.8 == 1.2.1 == 1.7 == 1.5.2 == 0.3 == 0.9.1 == 1.6.2 <= 1.7.2 == 0.9 == 1.1.3 == 1.4 == 1.2 == 1.4.1
CVE-2013-5314	Low	August 19, 2013 8/19/13	<= 1.6.2 == 0.3 == 0.4 == 0.7 == 0.7.1 == 0.8 == 0.8.1 == 0.8.2 == 0.8.3 == 0.8.4 == 0.8.5 == 0.9 == 0.9.1 == 1.0 == 1.0.1 == 1.0.2 == 1.0.3 == 1.0.4 == 1.1 == 1.1.1 == 1.1.2 == 1.1.3 == 1.1.4 == 1.2 == 1.2.1 == 1.3 == 1.3.1 == 1.4 == 1.4.1 == 1.5.1 == 1.5.2 == 1.5.3 == 1.5.4 == 1.5.5 == 1.6 == 1.6.1
CVE-2012-2331	Low	August 13, 2012 8/13/12	<= 1.6 == 0.3 == 0.4 == 0.7 == 0.7.1 == 0.8 == 0.8.1 == 0.8.2 == 0.8.3 == 0.8.4 == 0.8.5 == 0.9 == 0.9.1 == 1.0 == 1.0.1 == 1.0.2 == 1.0.3 == 1.0.4 == 1.1 == 1.1.1 == 1.1.2 == 1.1.3 == 1.1.4 == 1.2 == 1.2.1 == 1.3 == 1.3.1 == 1.4 == 1.4.1 == 1.5.1 == 1.5.2 == 1.5.3 == 1.5.4 == 1.5.5 == 1.6.1
CVE-2012-2332	High	August 13, 2012 8/13/12	<= 1.6 == 0.3 == 0.4 == 0.7 == 0.7.1 == 0.8 == 0.8.1 == 0.8.2 == 0.8.3 == 0.8.4 == 0.8.5 == 0.9 == 0.9.1 == 1.0 == 1.0.1 == 1.0.2 == 1.0.3 == 1.0.4 == 1.1 == 1.1.1 == 1.1.2 == 1.1.3 == 1.1.4 == 1.2 == 1.2.1 == 1.3 == 1.3.1 == 1.4 == 1.4.1 == 1.5.1 == 1.5.2 == 1.5.3 == 1.5.4 == 1.5.5 == 1.6.1
CVE-2012-2762	High	June 7, 2012 6/7/12	<= 1.6.1 == 0.3 == 0.4 == 0.7 == 0.7.1 == 0.8 == 0.8.1 == 0.8.2 == 0.8.3 == 0.8.4 == 0.8.5 == 0.9 == 0.9.1 == 1.0 == 1.0.1 == 1.0.2 == 1.0.3 == 1.0.4 == 1.1 == 1.1.1 == 1.1.2 == 1.1.3 == 1.1.4 == 1.2 == 1.2.1 == 1.3 == 1.3.1 == 1.4 == 1.4.1 == 1.5.1 == 1.5.2 == 1.5.3 == 1.5.4 == 1.5.5 == 1.6
CVE-2011-3800	Medium	September 24, 2011 9/24/11	== 1.5.5
CVE-2010-2957	Low	September 10, 2010 9/10/10	== 0.5 == 1.0.3 == 1.3 == 1.1.4 == 0.4 == 0.8-beta6 == 1.0-beta2 == 0.8.5 == 0.7 == 1.1.2 == 1.0.4 == 1.5 == 0.7-beta3 == 0.8.3 == 1.5-beta1 == 0.8.4 == 0.8.2 == 0.6-pl3 == 1.0.2 == 1.1.1 == 1.1 == 0.7-rc1 == 1.0-beta1 <= 1.5.3 == 0.7.1 == 0.7-beta4 == 1.0.1 == 1.0 == 0.6-pl1 == 0.7-beta2 == 0.6-rc2 == 1.3.1 == 0.8.1 == 1.5.1 == 0.8 == 1.0-beta3 == 1.2-beta5 == 0.8-beta6_snapshot == 1.2.1 == 1.5.2 == 0.6-pl2 == 0.3 == 0.6-rc1 == 0.8-beta5 == 0.9.1 == 0.9 == 1.1.3 == 1.1-beta1 == 0.7-beta1 == 1.4 == 1.2 == 1.4.1 == 0.5-pl1 == 0.6
CVE-2010-1916	High	May 12, 2010 5/12/10	== 0.3 == 0.4 == 0.5-pl1 == 0.6-pl3 == 0.7 == 0.7.1 == 0.8 == 0.8.1 == 0.8.2 == 0.8.3 == 0.8.4 == 0.8.5 == 0.9 == 0.9.1 == 1.0 == 1.0.1 == 1.0.2 == 1.0.3 == 1.0.4 == 1.1 == 1.1.1 == 1.1.2 == 1.1.3 == 1.1.4 == 1.2 == 1.2.1 == 1.3 == 1.3.1 == 1.4 == 1.4.1 == 1.5 == 1.5.1 == 1.5.2
CVE-2009-4412	Medium	December 24, 2009 12/24/09	== 0.5 == 1.0.3 == 1.3 == 1.1.4 == 0.4 == 0.8.5 == 0.7 == 1.1.2 == 1.0.4 == 0.8.3 == 0.8.4 == 0.8.2 == 0.6-pl3 == 1.0.2 == 1.1.1 == 1.1 == 0.7.1 == 1.0.1 == 1.0 == 1.3.1 == 0.8.1 == 0.8 == 1.2.1 == 0.3 <= 1.5 == 0.9.1 == 0.9 == 1.1.3 == 1.1-beta1 == 1.4 == 1.2 == 1.4.1 == 0.5-pl1 == 0.6
CVE-2008-1385	Low	April 23, 2008 4/23/08	== 1.0.3 == 1.1.4 == 0.4 == 0.8.5 == 0.7 == 1.1.2 == 1.0.4 == 0.8.3 == 0.8.4 == 0.8.2 == 1.0.2 == 1.1.1 == 1.1 == 0.7.1 == 0.5_pl1 == 1.0.1 == 1.0 == 0.8.1 == 0.8 <= 1.3 == 1.2.1 == 0.3 == 0.6_pl3 == 0.9.1 == 0.9 == 1.1.3 == 1.2
CVE-2008-1386	Low	April 23, 2008 4/23/08	== 1.3
CVE-2008-0124	Low	February 28, 2008 2/28/08	== 0.5 == 0.8_beta5 == 1.0.3 == 1.1.4 == 0.4 == 0.7 == 1.0.4 == 0.7_beta1 == 1.0_beta3 == 0.8.2 == 0.6_rc1 == 1.1.1 == 0.8_beta_6_snapshot == 0.7.1 == 0.5_pl1 == 0.6_pl2 == 1.0_beta2 == 0.7_beta3 == 0.8_beta6 == 0.7_beta4 == 0.6_pl1 == 0.8.1 == 0.8 == 1.2.1 == 0.3 == 0.6_pl3 == 0.9.1 == 0.6_rc2 == 1.2__beta5 == 1.1.3 == 1.2 == 0.7_beta2 == 0.7_rc1 == 0.6
CVE-2007-6205	Low	December 11, 2007 12/11/07	== 0.5 == 0.8_beta5 == 1.0.3 == 1.1.4 == 0.4 == 0.8.5 == 0.7 == 1.0.4 == 0.7_beta1 == 1.0_beta3 == 0.8.3 == 0.8.4 == 0.8.2 == 0.6_rc1 == 1.1.1 == 0.8_beta_6 == 0.7.1 == 0.5_pl1 == 1.0_beta1 == 0.6_pl2 == 1.0_beta2 == 0.7_beta3 == 0.8_beta6 == 0.7_beta4 == 0.6_pl1 == 0.8.1 == 0.8_beta_5 == 0.8 == 0.3 == 0.6_pl3 == 0.9.1 == 0.6_rc2 == 0.9 == 1.1.3 == 0.7_beta2 == 0.7_rc1 == 0.6
CVE-2006-6242	Medium	December 3, 2006 12/3/06	== 0.5 == 0.8_beta5 == 1.0.3 == 0.4 == 0.7 == 0.7_beta1 == 1.0_beta3 == 0.8.2 == 0.6_rc1 == 0.7.1 == 0.5_pl1 == 0.6_pl2 == 1.0_beta2 == 0.7_beta3 == 0.8_beta6 == 0.7_beta4 == 0.6_pl1 == 0.8.1 == 0.8 == 0.3 == 0.6_pl3 == 0.9.1 == 0.6_rc2 == 0.7_beta2 == 0.7_rc1 == 0.6
CVE-2006-2495	High	May 20, 2006 5/20/06	== 0.5 == 0.4 == 0.8.5 == 0.7 == 0.8.3 == 0.8.4 == 0.8.2 == 0.7.1 == 0.5_pl1 == 1.0_beta1 == 1.0_beta2 == 0.8.1 == 0.8 == 0.3 == 0.6_pl3 == 0.9.1 == 0.9 == 0.6
CVE-2006-1910	High	April 20, 2006 4/20/06	== 1.0_beta2
CVE-2005-3129	Medium	October 4, 2005 10/4/05	<= 0.8.4
CVE-2005-1713	Low	May 24, 2005 5/24/05	== 0.8
CVE-2005-1448	Medium	May 3, 2005 5/3/05	== 0.8_beta5 == 0.7 == 0.7_beta1 == 0.7.1 == 0.7_beta3 == 0.8_beta6 == 0.7_beta4 == 0.7_beta2 == 0.7_rc1
CVE-2005-1449	High	May 3, 2005 5/3/05	== 0.8_beta5 == 0.4 == 0.7 == 0.7_beta1 == 0.7.1 == 0.5_pl1 == 0.7_beta3 == 0.8_beta6 == 0.7_beta4 == 0.3 == 0.6_pl3 == 0.7_beta2 == 0.7_rc1
CVE-2005-1450	High	May 3, 2005 5/3/05	== 0.4 == 0.7 == 0.7.1 == 0.5_pl1 == 0.3 == 0.6_pl3
CVE-2005-1451	High	May 3, 2005 5/3/05	== 0.4 == 0.7 == 0.7_beta1 == 0.8_beta_6 == 0.7.1 == 0.5_pl1 == 0.7_beta3 == 0.7_beta4 == 0.8_beta_5 == 0.3 == 0.6_pl3 == 0.7_beta2 == 0.7_rc1

sy9 / serendipity

1 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Exploit	Date	Affected Version
CVE-2005-1712	High		May 24, 2005 5/24/05	== 0.8

serendipity / serendipity

5 vulnerabilities found

Title	Severity	Date	Affected Version
CVE-2008-1476	Low	March 24, 2008 3/24/08	== 0.8 == 0.9.1 == 1.1.2 == 1.0.1 == 0.3 == 0.8.3 <= 1.2.1 == 1.1 == 1.0.4 == 1.1.3 == 0.8.2 == 0.8.4 == 0.9 == 0.8.1 == 0.7.1 == 1.1.4 == 0.6_pl3 == 1.2 == 1.0.2 == 0.5_pl1 == 0.8.5 == 1.1.1 == 0.4 == 0.7 == 1.0 == 1.0.3
CVE-2007-6390	Low	December 17, 2007 12/17/07	<= 0.12
CVE-2007-4282	Medium	August 9, 2007 8/9/07	== 1.1.3
CVE-2007-1326	High	March 7, 2007 3/7/07	== 1.1.1
CVE-2006-5499	Medium	October 25, 2006 10/25/06	<= 1.0.1

Showing vulnerabilities for 3 products matching "serendipity". Each product has independent pagination.

Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity

SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.

No setup fees
5-min deployment
Cancel anytime

Book a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.