Vulnerability Database

346,508

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "sunos"

Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/sunos/1.2.3

sun / sunos

1292 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High May 12, 2000 5/12/00
== 5.7
== 5.8
High April 24, 2000 4/24/00
== 5.7
High April 24, 2000 4/24/00
== 5.7
High April 24, 2000 4/24/00
== 5.7
== 5.8
High January 6, 2000 1/6/00
== 5.3
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
Low December 31, 1999 12/31/99
<= 4.1.1
High December 31, 1999 12/31/99
== 4.1.1
== 4.1.3
== 4.1.2
== 4.1.3c
High December 31, 1999 12/31/99
== 5.0
High December 31, 1999 12/31/99
== 4.1.1
== 4.1.3
== 4.1.2
== 4.1.3c
Low December 31, 1999 12/31/99
== 5.8
Medium December 22, 1999 12/22/99
== 5.7
High December 22, 1999 12/22/99
== 5.7
High December 10, 1999 12/10/99
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.5.1
High December 9, 1999 12/9/99
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
High December 7, 1999 12/7/99
== 5.3
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
Low December 1, 1999 12/1/99
== 5.7
== 5.5.1
Low December 1, 1999 12/1/99
== 5.7
== 5.5.1
High November 30, 1999 11/30/99
== 5.7
High November 30, 1999 11/30/99
== 5.7
High November 20, 1999 11/20/99
== 5.7
High November 10, 1999 11/10/99
== 5.7
High November 10, 1999 11/10/99
== 5.7
High November 10, 1999 11/10/99
== 5.7
Medium November 10, 1999 11/10/99
== 5.7
Low November 10, 1999 11/10/99
== 5.7
High November 2, 1999 11/2/99
== 5.7
High November 2, 1999 11/2/99
== 5.7
Medium September 23, 1999 9/23/99
== 5.7
== 5.5.1
Low September 22, 1999 9/22/99
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
High September 13, 1999 9/13/99
== 5.3
== 4.1.4
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
== 4.1.3u1
High September 13, 1999 9/13/99
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.5.1
High September 13, 1999 9/13/99
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
Low September 13, 1999 9/13/99
== 5.7
High September 8, 1999 9/8/99
== 5.7
High August 9, 1999 8/9/99
== 5.3
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
== 5.1
== 5.2
Low August 9, 1999 8/9/99
== 5.5
== 5.5.1
High July 1, 1999 7/1/99
== 5.3
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
== 4.1.3
Low June 10, 1999 6/10/99
== 5.7
High June 9, 1999 6/9/99
== 5.3
== 4.1.4
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 4.1.3
== 5.0
== 5.1
== 5.2
High June 7, 1999 6/7/99
== 5.3
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
High May 11, 1999 5/11/99
== 5.7
High May 10, 1999 5/10/99
== 5.0
Low March 9, 1999 3/9/99
== 5.7
High March 8, 1999 3/8/99
== 5.7
== 5.5.1
Low March 1, 1999 3/1/99
== 5.4
Low February 10, 1999 2/10/99
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
High January 28, 1999 1/28/99
== 5.7
Low January 7, 1999 1/7/99
== 5.7
== 5.5
== 5.5.1
High December 17, 1998 12/17/98
== 5.3
== 5.5
== 5.4
== 5.5.1
High November 16, 1998 11/16/98
*

Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "sunos". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.