Vulnerability Database

328,411

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "vlc_media_player"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/vlc_media_player/1.2.3

videolan / vlc_media_player

113 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High November 22, 2023 11/22/23
< 3.0.19
High November 7, 2023 11/7/23
< 3.0.20
Critical November 7, 2023 11/7/23
< 3.0.20
High December 6, 2022 12/6/22
<= 3.0.17.4
High July 26, 2021 7/26/21
== 3.0.11
High July 26, 2021 7/26/21
== 3.0.11
High July 26, 2021 7/26/21
== 3.0.11
High July 26, 2021 7/26/21
== 3.0.11
High January 8, 2021 1/8/21
< 3.0.12
High June 8, 2020 6/8/20
< 3.0.11
High May 15, 2020 5/15/20
< 3.0.9
Medium February 6, 2020 2/6/20
< 2.0.7
Medium January 31, 2020 1/31/20
< 2.0.7
High January 24, 2020 1/24/20
< 2.1.6
High January 24, 2020 1/24/20
< 2.1.6
High January 24, 2020 1/24/20
< 2.1.6
High January 24, 2020 1/24/20
< 2.1.6
High January 24, 2020 1/24/20
< 2.1.6
>= 2.2.0 < 2.2.1
High January 24, 2020 1/24/20
< 2.1.6
High October 23, 2019 10/23/19
== 3.0.8
Medium August 29, 2019 8/29/19
== 3.0.7.1
Low August 29, 2019 8/29/19
== 3.0.7.1
Medium August 29, 2019 8/29/19
== 3.0.7.1
Medium August 29, 2019 8/29/19
== 3.0.7.1
Medium August 29, 2019 8/29/19
== 3.0.7.1
Medium August 29, 2019 8/29/19
== 3.0.7.1
Medium August 29, 2019 8/29/19
== 3.0.7.1
Medium August 29, 2019 8/29/19
== 3.0.7.1
Medium August 29, 2019 8/29/19
== 3.0.7.1
Medium August 29, 2019 8/29/19
== 3.0.7.1
High July 30, 2019 7/30/19
< 3.0.7
Medium July 30, 2019 7/30/19
<= 3.0.6
Critical July 18, 2019 7/18/19
<= 3.0.7
Low July 16, 2019 7/16/19
< 3.0.3
High July 14, 2019 7/14/19
<= 3.0.7.1
High June 18, 2019 6/18/19
>= 3.0.0 <= 3.0.7
Low June 13, 2019 6/13/19
< 3.0.7
Medium December 5, 2018 12/5/18
== 3.0.4
Medium July 11, 2018 7/11/18
<= 2.2.8
High May 28, 2018 5/28/18
== 3.0.1
== 3.0.0
Medium December 15, 2017 12/15/17
<= 2.2.8
High June 30, 2017 6/30/17
== 2.2.7
== 2.2.4
== 2.2.2
== 2.2.5.1
== 2.2.3
== 2.2.6
== 2.2.1
== 2.2.0
== 2.2.5
Medium May 29, 2017 5/29/17
<= 2.2.4
Medium May 29, 2017 5/29/17
<= 2.2.4
Low May 23, 2017 5/23/17
== 2.2.4
== 2.2.2
== 2.2.3
== 2.2.1
== 2.2.0
== 2.2.5
Medium May 23, 2017 5/23/17
<= 2.2.4
Low May 23, 2017 5/23/17
< 2.2.6
Low May 23, 2017 5/23/17
<= 2.2.4
High June 8, 2016 6/8/16
<= 2.2.3
Low April 18, 2016 4/18/16
<= 2.1.6

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.