Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "w3m"

Found 3 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/w3m/1.2.3

w3m / w3m

5 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium June 16, 2010 6/16/10
== 0.5.2
High December 27, 2006 12/27/06
== 0.5.1
Medium February 19, 2003 2/19/03
== 0.2.1
== 0.3.2
== 0.2.3
== 0.3.1
== 0.2.5.1
== 0.3
== 0.3.2.2
== 0.2
== 0.2.2
== 0.3.2.1
== 0.2.4
== 0.2.5
Low December 11, 2002 12/11/02
== 0.3.2
High September 20, 2001 9/20/01
== 0.1.4
== 0.1.3
== 0.1.8
== 0.1.9
== 0.1.10
== 0.1.7
== 0.1.6
== 0.2
<= 0.2.1

tats / w3m

40 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium December 21, 2023 12/21/23
== 0.5.3+git20230129
== 0.5.3+git20230121-1
== 0.5.3+git20230121-2
Low July 14, 2023 7/14/23
== 0.5.3+git20230121
Low July 14, 2023 7/14/23
== 0.5.3+git20230121
High August 15, 2022 8/15/22
== 0.5.3
Low January 25, 2018 1/25/18
<= 0.5.3
Medium January 25, 2018 1/25/18
<= 0.5.3
Medium January 25, 2018 1/25/18
<= 0.5.3
Low January 20, 2017 1/20/17
<= 0.5.3\+git20160718
Low January 20, 2017 1/20/17
<= 0.5.3\+git20160718
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-32
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Low December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Medium December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
High December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Medium December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Medium December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Medium December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Medium December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30
Medium December 12, 2016 12/12/16
<= 0.5.3-30

Showing vulnerabilities for 3 products matching "w3m". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.