Vulnerabilities for products matching "webmail"
Found 12 matching products. Filters apply to all results.
You can search for specific versions with /product/webmail/1.2.3
imp / webmail
1 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
High | December 6, 2001 12/6/01 |
<= 2.2.6
|
cobalt / webmail
1 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Medium | July 5, 2001 7/5/01 |
== 2.0.1
|
netwin / webmail
4 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
High | February 27, 2008 2/27/08 |
<= 3.1s
|
|
|
|
High | May 14, 2007 5/14/07 |
== 3.1s1
== 3.1s13
|
|
|
|
Low | December 31, 2004 12/31/04 |
== 3.1d
|
|
|
|
Low | December 31, 2004 12/31/04 |
== 3.1d
|
nikosoft / webmail
1 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Low | June 1, 2005 6/1/05 |
== 0.8.3
== 0.4
== 0.9.2
== 0.9.8
== 0.1
== 0.7.5
== 0.10.1
== 0.8.1
== 0.7
== 0.9.0
== 0.7.7
== 0.9.7
== 0.5
== 0.10.3
== 0.9.10
== 0.9.9
== 0.10.0
== o.6
== 0.9.5
== 0.2
== 0.10.4
== 0.9.6
== 0.7.9
== 0.8.0
== 0.9.3
== 0.10.2
== 0.7.6
== 0.8.2
== 0.9.4
== 0.9.1
== 0.3
|
roundcube / webmail
70 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
High | December 18, 2025 12/18/25 |
< 1.5.12
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.12
|
|
|
|
High | December 18, 2025 12/18/25 |
< 1.5.12
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.12
|
|
|
|
Critical | June 2, 2025 6/2/25 |
< 1.5.10
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.11
|
|
|
|
Medium | February 3, 2025 2/3/25 |
== 1.6.9
|
|
|
|
Critical | August 5, 2024 8/5/24 |
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.8
< 1.5.8
|
|
|
|
Critical | August 5, 2024 8/5/24 |
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.8
< 1.5.8
|
|
|
|
Critical | June 7, 2024 6/7/24 |
< 1.5.7
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.7
|
|
|
|
Medium | June 7, 2024 6/7/24 |
< 1.5.7
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.7
|
|
|
|
Medium | June 7, 2024 6/7/24 |
< 1.5.7
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.7
|
|
|
|
Medium | November 6, 2023 11/6/23 |
>= 1.5.0 < 1.5.6
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.5
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 18, 2023 10/18/23 |
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.4
>= 1.5.0 < 1.5.5
< 1.4.15
|
|
|
|
Medium | September 22, 2023 9/22/23 |
>= 1.6.0 < 1.6.3
< 1.4.14
>= 1.5.0 < 1.5.4
|
|
|
|
Critical | November 19, 2021 11/19/21 |
< 1.3.17
>= 1.4.0 < 1.4.12
|
|
|
|
Medium | November 19, 2021 11/19/21 |
< 1.3.17
>= 1.4.0 < 1.4.12
|
|
|
|
Medium | June 24, 2021 6/24/21 |
== 1.4.4
|
|
|
|
Medium | June 24, 2021 6/24/21 |
<= 1.4.4
|
|
|
|
Medium | February 9, 2021 2/9/21 |
< 1.4.11
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 28, 2020 12/28/20 |
>= 1.4 < 1.4.10
>= 1.3.0 < 1.3.16
< 1.2.13
|
|
|
|
Medium | August 12, 2020 8/12/20 |
< 1.3.15
>= 1.4.0 < 1.4.8
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 6, 2020 7/6/20 |
>= 1.4.0 < 1.4.7
>= 1.3.0 < 1.3.14
< 1.2.11
|
|
|
|
Medium | June 9, 2020 6/9/20 |
< 1.3.12
>= 1.4.0 < 1.4.5
|
|
|
|
Medium | June 9, 2020 6/9/20 |
< 1.3.12
>= 1.4.0 < 1.4.5
|
|
|
|
Critical | May 4, 2020 5/4/20 |
>= 1.3.0 < 1.3.11
>= 1.4.0 < 1.4.4
>= 1.2.0 < 1.2.10
|
|
|
|
Critical | May 4, 2020 5/4/20 |
>= 1.3.0 < 1.3.11
>= 1.4.0 < 1.4.4
>= 1.2.0 < 1.2.10
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 4, 2020 5/4/20 |
< 1.4.4
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 4, 2020 5/4/20 |
< 1.4.4
|
|
|
|
High | August 20, 2019 8/20/19 |
<= 1.3.9
|
|
|
|
Low | April 7, 2019 4/7/19 |
< 1.3.10
|
|
|
|
Medium | November 12, 2018 11/12/18 |
< 1.3.7
|
|
|
|
Low | November 12, 2018 11/12/18 |
< 1.3.8
|
|
|
|
Medium | April 7, 2018 4/7/18 |
>= 1.2.0 <= 1.3.5
|
|
|
|
Medium | March 13, 2018 3/13/18 |
<= 1.3.4
|
|
|
|
High | November 9, 2017 11/9/17 |
== 1.2.2
== 1.2.0
== 1.2.1
<= 1.1.9
== 1.3.2
== 1.3.1
== 1.3.0
== 1.2.6
== 1.2.5
== 1.2.4
== 1.2.3
|
|
|
|
Low | May 23, 2017 5/23/17 |
== 1.1
== 1.1-beta
== 1.1-rc
|
|
|
|
Low | May 23, 2017 5/23/17 |
== 1.1
== 1.1-beta
== 1.1-rc
|
|
|
|
Medium | May 23, 2017 5/23/17 |
== 1.1
== 1.1-beta
== 1.1-rc
|
|
|
|
High | April 29, 2017 4/29/17 |
< 1.0.11
>= 1.1.0 < 1.1.9
>= 1.2.0 < 1.2.5
|
|
|
|
Low | April 13, 2017 4/13/17 |
<= 1.0.8
== 1.1
== 1.1-beta
== 1.1-rc
== 1.1.4
|
|
|
|
Low | April 13, 2017 4/13/17 |
<= 1.0.8
== 1.1
== 1.1-beta
== 1.1-rc
== 1.1.4
|
|
|
|
Low | March 12, 2017 3/12/17 |
== 1.2.2
== 1.2.0
== 1.2.1
== 1.2.3
<= 1.1.7
|
|
|
|
High | January 30, 2017 1/30/17 |
<= 1.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 30, 2017 1/30/17 |
< 1.1.0
|
|
|
|
Low | December 20, 2016 12/20/16 |
== 1.2-rc
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 8, 2016 12/8/16 |
<= 1.1.6
== 1.2.2
== 1.2.0
== 1.2.1
|
|
|
|
Medium | August 25, 2016 8/25/16 |
<= 1.1.4
|
|
|
|
Low | January 29, 2016 1/29/16 |
== 1.1.0
== 1.1.1
<= 1.0.5
|
|
|
|
Low | November 10, 2015 11/10/15 |
<= 1.0.6
== 1.1.0
== 1.1.2
== 1.1.1
|
|
|
|
Low | February 3, 2015 2/3/15 |
<= 1.0.4
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 15, 2015 1/15/15 |
<= 1.0.3
|
|
|
|
Medium | February 8, 2014 2/8/14 |
== 0.5.2
<= 0.7.2
== 0.5.4
== 0.1-rc1
== 0.1-20050820
== 0.1-20051007
== 0.4
== 0.1
== 0.1-beta2
== 0.8.5
== 0.1-beta
== 0.1-20050811
== 0.3-rc1
== 0.5-rc
== 0.8.3
== 0.2-stable
== 0.2-alpha
== 0.8.1
== 0.1-rc2
== 0.3-beta
== 0.1-stable
== 0.7
== 0.5-beta
== 0.4.2
== 0.8.0
== 0.8.2
== 0.1-20051021
== 0.5.1
== 0.6
== 0.2.2
== 0.3
== 0.1.1
== 0.4-beta
== 0.1-alpha
== 0.4.1
== 0.7.1
== 0.2
== 0.5.3
== 0.2-beta
== 0.3.1
== 0.5
== 0.2.1
== 0.8.4
== 0.3-stable
|
vdesk / webmail
1 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Low | May 17, 2007 5/17/07 |
== 4.03
|
uebimiau / webmail
2 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Medium | January 10, 2008 1/10/08 |
== 2.7.10
== 2.7.2
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 8, 2008 1/8/08 |
== 2.7.10
== 2.7.2
|
atmail / webmail
1 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Low | October 9, 2011 10/9/11 |
== 6.1.5
== 6.1.6
== 6.1.7
<= 6.1.9
== 6.1.8
== 6.1.2
== 6.1.4
== 6.1.3
|
afterlogic / webmail
1 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Low | September 19, 2017 9/19/17 |
== 7.7
|
rainloop / webmail
2 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Medium | July 28, 2022 7/28/22 |
<= 1.16.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | March 20, 2020 3/20/20 |
< 1.13.0
|
mailtraq / webmail
1 vulnerabilities found| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Low | March 12, 2019 3/12/19 |
== 2.17.7.3550
|
Showing vulnerabilities for 12 products matching "webmail". Each product has independent pagination.
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.