Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.
You can search for specific versions with /product/zonealarm/1.2.3
| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Medium | September 24, 2007 9/24/07 |
== 7.0.362.000
|
|
|
|
Low | May 2, 2007 5/2/07 |
== 6.1.744.001
== 6.5.737.000
|
|
|
|
Medium | April 18, 2007 4/18/07 |
<= 6.5.714.000
|
|
|
|
Medium | January 19, 2007 1/19/07 |
*
|
|
|
|
High | November 16, 2005 11/16/05 |
== 6.0
|
|
|
|
High | May 24, 2005 5/24/05 |
*
|
|
|
|
Low | February 11, 2005 2/11/05 |
== 5.5.062.011
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 31, 2004 12/31/04 |
== 4.0
== 5.5
== 5.0.590.015
== 4.5.538.001
== 4.5
|
|
|
|
Low | December 31, 2004 12/31/04 |
== 1.0
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 6, 2004 12/6/04 |
== 5.0.590.015
|
|
|
|
High | November 23, 2004 11/23/04 |
== 4.0
== 4.5
|
|
|
|
High | April 14, 2004 4/14/04 |
== 4.0
== 2.6
== 2.4
== 4.5.538.001
== 3.1
== 4.5
== 3.0
|
|
|
|
High | December 31, 2003 12/31/03 |
== 3.7.211
== 3.7.202
|
|
|
|
Medium | December 31, 2002 12/31/02 |
== 3.1
== 3.0
|
|
|
|
High | December 31, 2002 12/31/02 |
== 3.0
|
|
|
|
Low | December 31, 2001 12/31/01 |
== 2.1
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.3
== 2.2
== 2.5
|
|
|
|
Medium | August 29, 2001 8/29/01 |
*
|
|
|
|
Medium | July 18, 2001 7/18/01 |
== 2.1
== 2.4
== 2.6
== 2.3
== 2.2
== 2.5
|
|
|
|
High | April 24, 2000 4/24/00 |
<= 2.2.10
|
|
|
|
Medium | February 24, 2000 2/24/00 |
== 2.0.26
|
| Title | Severity | Exploit | Date | Affected Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
High | September 27, 2022 9/27/22 |
< 15.8.211.19229
|
|
|
|
High | May 11, 2022 5/11/22 |
< 15.8.211.192119
|
|
|
|
High | October 27, 2020 10/27/20 |
< 15.8.139.18543
|
|
|
|
Medium | October 27, 2020 10/27/20 |
< 15.8.139.18543
|
|
|
|
High | April 22, 2019 4/22/19 |
<= 15.4.062
|
|
|
|
Low | April 17, 2019 4/17/19 |
<= 15.4.062
|
|
|
|
High | April 17, 2019 4/17/19 |
<= 15.4.062
|
|
|
|
High | March 1, 2019 3/1/19 |
<= 15.3.064.17729
|
|
|
|
Low | August 21, 2009 8/21/09 |
== 8.0.020.000
|
|
|
|
Medium | August 19, 2009 8/19/09 |
== 7.0.483.000
== 8.0.020.000
|
|
|
|
High | August 21, 2007 8/21/07 |
== 6.1.744.001
<= 7.0.337.0
== 5.0.63.0
|
|
|
|
High | May 16, 2007 5/16/07 |
<= 6.1.744.001
|
|
|
|
High | April 24, 2007 4/24/07 |
<= 5.0.63.0
|
|
|
|
High | December 31, 2005 12/31/05 |
<= 7.0.337.0
|
Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "zonealarm". Each product has independent pagination.
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.