Strapi through 4.5.6 does not verify the access or ID tokens issued during the OAuth flow when the AWS Cognito login provider is used for authentication.
Strapi through 4.5.6 does not verify the access or ID tokens issued during the OAuth flow when the AWS Cognito login provider is used for authentication. A remote attacker could forge an ID token that is signed using the 'None' type algorithm to bypass authentication and impersonate any user that use AWS Cognito for authentication.
Reviewing of application logs is recommended to detect any suspicious activity. Running the following regex pattern will extract all ID tokens sent to /api/auth/cognito/callback.
/\/api\/auth\/cognito\/callback\?[\s\S]*id_token=\s*([\S]*)/
Once you have a list of the ID tokens, you will need to verify each token using the public key file for your AWS Cognito user pool that you can download from https://cognito-idp.{region}.amazonaws.com/{userPoolId}/.well-known/jwks.json. If there are any JWT tokens that cannot be verified using the correct public key, then you need to inspect the JWT body and see if it contains the email and cognito:username claims (example below).
{
"cognito:username": "auth-bypass-example",
"email": "user@example.com"
}
If there are any JWTs that have this body, verify when the account with the email address was created. If the account was created earlier than the request to /api/auth/cognito/callback with the invalid JWT token, then you need to contact the user to inform them their account has been breached!
After upgrading to Strapi v4.6.0 or greater you will need to reconfigure your AWS Cognito provider to include the JWKS URL for it to work properly. If you do not reconfigure your provider you will receive an error message when attempting to login.
Any Strapi user using the users-permissions AWS Cognito provider before 4.6.0
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
@strapi / plugin-users-permissions
|
3.2.1 | 4.6.0 |
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.