Vulnerability Database

352,427

Total vulnerabilities in the database

AWS SDK for PHP has CloudFront Policy Document Injection via Special Characters — aws / aws-sdk-php

Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences

Summary

This notification is related to the CloudFront signing utilities in the AWS SDK for PHP, which are used to generate Amazon CloudFront signed URLs and signed cookies. A defense-in-depth enhancement has been implemented to improve handling of special characters, such as double quotes and backslashes, in input values.

Impact

The CloudFront signing utilities build policy documents that define access restrictions for signed URLs and cookies. If an application passes unsanitized input containing special characters to these utilities, the resulting policy document may not reflect the application's intended access restrictions. While the SDK was functioning safely within the requirements of the shared responsibility model, additional safeguards have been added to support secure customer implementations. Applications that already follow AWS security best practices for input validation are not impacted.

Impacted versions: 3.11.7 - 3.371.3

Patches

On 3/3/2026, an enhancement was made to the AWS SDK for PHP version 3.371.4. The enhancement ensures that special characters in input values are correctly handled. It is recommended to upgrade to the latest version.

Workarounds

No workarounds are needed, but customers should ensure that the application is following security best practices:

  • Implement proper input validation in application code before passing values to CloudFront signing utilities
  • Update to the latest AWS SDK release on a regular basis
  • Follow AWS security best practices for SDK configuration

References

For any questions or comments about this advisory, it is recommended to contact AWS Security via the vulnerability reporting page or directly via email to [email protected]. Please do not create a public GitHub issue.

Acknowledgement

The Amazon Inspector Security Research team is thanked for identifying this issue and working through the coordinated process.

  • Published: Mar 27, 2026
  • Updated: Mar 28, 2026
  • GHSA: GHSA-27qh-8cxx-2cr5
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

No technical information available.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.