Affected versions of Better Auth allow an external request to configure baseURL when it isn’t defined through any other means. This can be abused to poison the router’s base path, causing all routes to return 404 for all users.
This issue is only exploitable when baseURL is not explicitly configured (e.g., BETTER_AUTH_URL is missing) and the attacker is able to make the very first request to the server after startup. In properly configured environments or typical managed hosting platforms, this fallback behavior cannot be reached.
A combination of X-Forwarded-Host and X-Forwarded-Proto is implicitly trusted. This allows the first request to configure baseURL whenever it is not explicitly configured.
Here's the code that reads the headers:
<img width="631" height="219" alt="headers" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b3fb0078-a62f-4058-9d0b-4afbd30c4953" />
Here's the call to getBaseURL(), the result is assigned to ctx.baseURL.
<img width="838" height="414" alt="write" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a7b4dd17-75c3-49ef-9d08-6a2079d6a0ea" />
Here's the router receiving the poisoned basePath:
<img width="594" height="372" alt="router" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5fdf2862-9cd1-4b96-b146-18e67d904157" />
X-Forwarded-Host and X-Forwarded-Proto can be used to modify the pathname of a parsed URL object which forms baseURL. basePath is then derived from the pathname of baseURL. Once the router basePath is poisoned it fails to match & route incoming requests.
Start a better-auth server with no baseURL configuration.
Send the following request as the first request to the server:
curl -i --location 'https://example.com/api/auth/ok' \
--header 'X-Forwarded-Proto: some:' \
--header 'X-Forwarded-Host: junk'
The better-auth API check endpoint returns 404.
Now send a regular request without the X-Forwarded-Proto and X-Forwarded-Host headers.
curl -i --location 'https://example.com/api/auth/ok'
The better-auth API check endpoint still returns 404.
Example result
<img width="662" height="307" alt="attack" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5a9cfdb5-3db7-4504-9f0a-b3c32a6dc823" />
We have modified the basePath for the router until the server is restarted. An attacker can repeatedly send these attack requests aiming to persistently exploit the vulnerability.
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.