Vulnerability Database

346,505

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2006-0032 — microsoft / windows_2003_server

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Indexing Service in Microsoft Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003, when the Encoding option is set to Auto Select, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a UTF-7 encoded URL, which is injected into an error message whose charset is set to UTF-7.

  • Published: Sep 12, 2006
  • Updated: Nov 9, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2006-0032
  • Severity: Low
  • Exploit:

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: Low
  • Score: 4.3
  • AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Software From Fixed in
microsoft / windows_2003_server datacenter_edition_itanium datacenter_edition_itanium.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server web-sp1_beta_1 web-sp1_beta_1.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server datacenter_edition-sp1_beta_1 datacenter_edition-sp1_beta_1.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server standard standard.x
microsoft / windows_xp - -
microsoft / windows_2003_server datacenter_edition_itanium-sp1_beta_1 datacenter_edition_itanium-sp1_beta_1.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server web web.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server enterprise_64-bit enterprise_64-bit.x
microsoft / windows_2000 - -
microsoft / windows_2003_server standard_64-bit standard_64-bit.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server standard-sp1_beta_1 standard-sp1_beta_1.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server r2 r2.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server datacenter_edition_itanium-sp1 datacenter_edition_itanium-sp1.x
microsoft / windows_2000 resource_kit resource_kit.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server web-sp1 web-sp1.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server sp1 sp1.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server enterprise_edition_itanium-sp1 enterprise_edition_itanium-sp1.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server enterprise_edition-sp1 enterprise_edition-sp1.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server standard-sp1 standard-sp1.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server enterprise_edition_itanium enterprise_edition_itanium.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server enterprise_edition-sp1_beta_1 enterprise_edition-sp1_beta_1.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server datacenter_edition datacenter_edition.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server datacenter_edition-sp1 datacenter_edition-sp1.x
microsoft / windows_2003_server enterprise_edition_itanium-sp1_beta_1 enterprise_edition_itanium-sp1_beta_1.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.