Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2010-0919

Stack-based buffer overflow in the Lotus Domino Web Access ActiveX control in IBM Lotus iNotes (aka Domino Web Access or DWA) 6.5, 7.0 before 7.0.4, 8.0, 8.0.2, and before 229.281 for Domino 8.0.2 FP4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long URL argument to an unspecified method, aka PRAD7JTNHJ.

  • Published: Mar 3, 2010
  • Updated: Nov 9, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2010-0919
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 7.6
  • AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
ibm / domino_web_access 8.0.2 8.0.2.x
ibm / domino_web_access 7.0 7.0.x
ibm / domino_web_access 7.0.1 7.0.1.x
ibm / domino_web_access 7.0.3 7.0.3.x
ibm / domino_web_access 6.5 6.5.x
ibm / domino_web_access 7.0.2 7.0.2.x
ibm / domino_web_access 8.0 8.0.x
ibm / lotus_inotes - 229.271.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.011 229.011.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.021 229.021.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.031 229.031.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.041 229.041.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.051 229.051.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.061 229.061.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.101 229.101.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.111 229.111.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.131 229.131.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.141 229.141.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.151 229.151.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.161 229.161.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.171 229.171.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.181 229.181.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.191 229.191.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.201 229.201.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.211 229.211.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.221 229.221.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.231 229.231.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.241 229.241.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.251 229.251.x
ibm / lotus_inotes 229.261 229.261.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.