Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2013-3665

Unspecified vulnerability in Autodesk AutoCAD through 2014, AutoCAD LT through 2014, and DWG TrueView through 2014 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted DWG file.

  • Published: Jul 18, 2013
  • Updated: Nov 9, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2013-3665
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 6.8
  • AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

No CWE or OWASP classifications available.

Software From Fixed in
autodesk / autocad_ecscad 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_ecscad 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_map_3d 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_mechanical 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_map_3d 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_architecture 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_civil_3d 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_structural_detailing 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_p&id 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_structural_detailing 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_utility_design 2014 2014.x
autodesk / dwg_trueview 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_electrical 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_utility_design 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_lt 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad_mep 2013 2013.x
autodesk / dwg_trueview 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_mep 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad_mep 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_structural_detailing 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad_lt 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_p&id 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_plant_3d 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_architecture 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_utility_design 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad_utility_design 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_electrical 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad 2014 2014.x
autodesk / dwg_trueview 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad_plant_3d 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_mechanical 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_mechanical 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad_ecscad 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_civil_3d 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_lt 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_plant_3d 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad_mechanical 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_electrical 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_p&id 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_architecture 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_electrical 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_civil_3d 2012 2012.x
autodesk / dwg_trueview 2014 2014.x
autodesk / autocad_lt 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_plant_3d 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_map_3d 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_ecscad 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad_structural_detailing 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad_map_3d 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad_mep 2011 2011.x
autodesk / autocad 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_civil_3d 2013 2013.x
autodesk / autocad_architecture 2012 2012.x
autodesk / autocad_p&id 2012 2012.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.