Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2015-2503

Microsoft Access 2007 SP3, Excel 2007 SP3, InfoPath 2007 SP3, OneNote 2007 SP3, PowerPoint 2007 SP3, Project 2007 SP3, Publisher 2007 SP3, Visio 2007 SP3, Word 2007 SP3, Office 2007 IME (Japanese) SP3, Access 2010 SP2, Excel 2010 SP2, InfoPath 2010 SP2, OneNote 2010 SP2, PowerPoint 2010 SP2, Project 2010 SP2, Publisher 2010 SP2, Visio 2010 SP2, Word 2010 SP2, Pinyin IME 2010, Access 2013 SP1, Excel 2013 SP1, InfoPath 2013 SP1, OneNote 2013 SP1, PowerPoint 2013 SP1, Project 2013 SP1, Publisher 2013 SP1, Visio 2013 SP1, Word 2013 SP1, Excel 2013 RT SP1, OneNote 2013 RT SP1, PowerPoint 2013 RT SP1, Word 2013 RT SP1, Access 2016, Excel 2016, OneNote 2016, PowerPoint 2016, Project 2016, Publisher 2016, Visio 2016, Word 2016, Skype for Business 2016, and Lync 2013 SP1 allow remote attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism and gain privileges via a crafted web site that is accessed with Internet Explorer, as demonstrated by a transition from Low Integrity to Medium Integrity, aka "Microsoft Office Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability."

  • Published: Nov 11, 2015
  • Updated: Nov 9, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2015-2503
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 9.3
  • AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
microsoft / word 2013-sp1 2013-sp1.x
microsoft / onenote 2010-sp2 2010-sp2.x
microsoft / publisher 2016 2016.x
microsoft / powerpoint 2013-sp1 2013-sp1.x
microsoft / project_server 2013-sp1 2013-sp1.x
microsoft / infopath 2010-sp2 2010-sp2.x
microsoft / word 2016 2016.x
microsoft / access 2013-sp1 2013-sp1.x
microsoft / onenote 2013-sp1 2013-sp1.x
microsoft / powerpoint 2010-sp2 2010-sp2.x
microsoft / powerpoint 2016 2016.x
microsoft / excel 2013-sp1 2013-sp1.x
microsoft / project 2007-sp3 2007-sp3.x
microsoft / visio 2016 2016.x
microsoft / excel 2016 2016.x
microsoft / infopath 2007-sp3 2007-sp3.x
microsoft / visio 2013-sp1 2013-sp1.x
microsoft / project_server 2010-sp2 2010-sp2.x
microsoft / infopath 2013-sp1 2013-sp1.x
microsoft / publisher 2013-sp1 2013-sp1.x
microsoft / lync 2013-sp1 2013-sp1.x
microsoft / visio 2007-sp3 2007-sp3.x
microsoft / onenote 2016 2016.x
microsoft / access 2016 2016.x
microsoft / powerpoint 2007-sp3 2007-sp3.x
microsoft / skype_for_business 2016 2016.x
microsoft / access 2010-sp2 2010-sp2.x
microsoft / publisher 2010-sp2 2010-sp2.x
microsoft / word 2010-sp2 2010-sp2.x
microsoft / project 2016 2016.x
microsoft / visio 2010-sp2 2010-sp2.x
microsoft / access 2007-sp3 2007-sp3.x
microsoft / publisher 2007-sp3 2007-sp3.x
microsoft / onenote 2007-sp3 2007-sp3.x
microsoft / excel 2007-sp3 2007-sp3.x
microsoft / excel 2010-sp2 2010-sp2.x
microsoft / word 2007-sp3 2007-sp3.x
microsoft / pinyin_ime 2010 2010.x
microsoft / office_2007_ime sp3 sp3.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.