Vulnerability Database

346,508

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2017-10614 — juniper / junos

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

A vulnerability in telnetd service on Junos OS allows a remote attacker to cause a limited memory and/or CPU consumption denial of service attack. This issue was found during internal product security testing. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS 12.1X46 prior to 12.1X46-D45; 12.3X48 prior to 12.3X48-D30; 14.1 prior to 14.1R4-S9, 14.1R8; 14.2 prior to 14.2R6; 15.1 prior to 15.1F5, 15.1R3; 15.1X49 prior to 15.1X49-D40; 15.1X53 prior to 15.1X53-D232, 15.1X53-D47.

  • Published: Oct 13, 2017
  • Updated: Nov 9, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2017-10614
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 5
  • AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d30 12.1x46-d30.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d25 12.1x46-d25.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46 12.1x46.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d35 12.1x46-d35.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d20 12.1x46-d20.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d40 12.1x46-d40.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d15 12.1x46-d15.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d10 12.1x46-d10.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d10 12.3x48-d10.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d15 12.3x48-d15.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d25 12.3x48-d25.x
juniper / junos 14.1-r1 14.1-r1.x
juniper / junos 14.1-r4 14.1-r4.x
juniper / junos 14.1 14.1.x
juniper / junos 14.1-r3 14.1-r3.x
juniper / junos 14.1-r8 14.1-r8.x
juniper / junos 14.1-r2 14.1-r2.x
juniper / junos 14.2-r1 14.2-r1.x
juniper / junos 14.2-r2 14.2-r2.x
juniper / junos 14.2-r3 14.2-r3.x
juniper / junos 14.2-r4 14.2-r4.x
juniper / junos 14.2-r5 14.2-r5.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d30 15.1x49-d30.x
juniper / junos 15.1-f1 15.1-f1.x
juniper / junos 15.1-f2-s3 15.1-f2-s3.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d62 15.1x53-d62.x
juniper / junos 15.1-r3 15.1-r3.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d20 15.1x53-d20.x
juniper / junos 15.1-f2-s2 15.1-f2-s2.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d30 15.1x53-d30.x
juniper / junos 15.1-f4 15.1-f4.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d33 15.1x53-d33.x
juniper / junos 15.1-f2-s4 15.1-f2-s4.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d25 15.1x53-d25.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d63 15.1x53-d63.x
juniper / junos 15.1-f2 15.1-f2.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d35 15.1x49-d35.x
juniper / junos 15.1-f3 15.1-f3.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d32 15.1x53-d32.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d34 15.1x53-d34.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d210 15.1x53-d210.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d70 15.1x53-d70.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d21 15.1x53-d21.x
juniper / junos 15.1-f2-s1 15.1-f2-s1.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d60 15.1x53-d60.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d20 15.1x49-d20.x
juniper / junos 15.1x53-d61 15.1x53-d61.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d10 15.1x49-d10.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.