Vulnerability Database

346,508

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2019-0010 — juniper / junos

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

An SRX Series Service Gateway configured for Unified Threat Management (UTM) may experience a system crash with the error message "mbuf exceed" -- an indication of memory buffer exhaustion -- due to the receipt of crafted HTTP traffic. Each crafted HTTP packet inspected by UTM consumes mbufs which can be identified through the following log messages: all_logs.0:Jun 8 03:25:03 srx1 node0.fpc4 : SPU3 jmpi mbuf stall 50%. all_logs.0:Jun 8 03:25:13 srx1 node0.fpc4 : SPU3 jmpi mbuf stall 51%. all_logs.0:Jun 8 03:25:24 srx1 node0.fpc4 : SPU3 jmpi mbuf stall 52%. ... Eventually the system runs out of mbufs and the system crashes (fails over) with the error "mbuf exceed". This issue only occurs when HTTP AV inspection is configured. Devices configured for Web Filtering alone are unaffected by this issue. Affected releases are Junos OS on SRX Series: 12.1X46 versions prior to 12.1X46-D81; 12.3X48 versions prior to 12.3X48-D77; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D101, 15.1X49-D110.

  • Published: Jan 15, 2019
  • Updated: Nov 9, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2019-0010
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 5
  • AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d60 12.1x46-d60.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d30 12.1x46-d30.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d45 12.1x46-d45.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d25 12.1x46-d25.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46 12.1x46.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d35 12.1x46-d35.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d20 12.1x46-d20.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d40 12.1x46-d40.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d15 12.1x46-d15.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d10 12.1x46-d10.x
juniper / junos 12.1x46-d55 12.1x46-d55.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d10 12.3x48-d10.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d15 12.3x48-d15.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d35 12.3x48-d35.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d50 12.3x48-d50.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d30 12.3x48-d30.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d25 12.3x48-d25.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d45 12.3x48-d45.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d55 12.3x48-d55.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d40 12.3x48-d40.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d60 12.3x48-d60.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d65 12.3x48-d65.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d70 12.3x48-d70.x
juniper / junos 12.3x48-d75 12.3x48-d75.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d50 15.1x49-d50.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d30 15.1x49-d30.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d70 15.1x49-d70.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d80 15.1x49-d80.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d60 15.1x49-d60.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d100 15.1x49-d100.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d35 15.1x49-d35.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d45 15.1x49-d45.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d75 15.1x49-d75.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d65 15.1x49-d65.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d90 15.1x49-d90.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d40 15.1x49-d40.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d20 15.1x49-d20.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d10 15.1x49-d10.x
juniper / junos 15.1x49-d55 15.1x49-d55.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.